<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Oezer</id>
	<title>LNTwww - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Oezer"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/Special:Contributions/Oezer"/>
	<updated>2026-05-03T17:43:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42511</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42511"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T10:02:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which two-port network has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The double zero is at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$ and the double pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Similarly, the following is obtained for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 2 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct in contrast to statement 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* While &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has two conjugate complex zeros, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; only has a single zero at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following applies for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The zero of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is now at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*The constant is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; only &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Finally, the following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Suggested solution 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is also correct here. In general, it can be said that: &lt;br /&gt;
*The partial fraction decomposition changes the number and position of the zeros. &lt;br /&gt;
* On the contrary, the poles of $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ are always identical to those of $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42510</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42510"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T10:00:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which two-port network has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The double zero is at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$ and the double pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Similarly, the following is obtained for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 2 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct in contrast to statement 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* While &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has two conjugate complex zeros, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; only has a single zero at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following applies for Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The zero of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is now at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*The constant is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; only &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Finally, the following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Suggested solution 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is also correct here. In general, it can be said that: &lt;br /&gt;
*The partial fraction decomposition changes the number and position of the zeros. &lt;br /&gt;
* On the contrary, the poles of $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ are always identical to those of $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42509</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42509"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T09:59:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which two-port network has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The double zero is at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$ and the double pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Similarly, the following is obtained for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 2 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct in contrast to statement 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* While &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has two conjugate complex zeros, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; only has a single zero at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following applies for Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The zero of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is now at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*The constant is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; only &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Finally, the following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Suggested solution 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is also correct here. In general, it can be said that: &lt;br /&gt;
*The partial fraction decomposition changes the number and position of the zeros. &lt;br /&gt;
* On the contrary, the poles of $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ are always identical to those of $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42508</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42508"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T09:57:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which quadripole has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The double zero is at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$ and the double pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Similarly, the following is obtained for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 2 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct in contrast to statement 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* While &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has two conjugate complex zeros, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; only has a single zero at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following applies for Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The zero of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is now at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*The constant is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; only &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Finally, the following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Suggested solution 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is also correct here. In general, it can be said that: &lt;br /&gt;
*The partial fraction decomposition changes the number and position of the zeros. &lt;br /&gt;
* On the contrary, the poles of $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ are always identical to those of $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42507</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42507"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T07:30:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which quadripole has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The double zero is at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$ and the double pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following holds for configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42506</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42506"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T07:30:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which quadripole has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The double zero is at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$ and the double pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The following holds for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42505</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42505"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T07:27:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which quadripole has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42504</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42504"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T07:27:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which quadripole has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right half-plane$p$&amp;amp;ndash; for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42503</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42503"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T07:26:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which quadripole has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a corresponding zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42502</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42502"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T07:25:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which quadripole has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; the attenuation function is then &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following can be seen from the graph on the information page: &amp;amp;nbsp; The configurations &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ and &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ satisfy exactly these symmetry properties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42501</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42501"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T07:22:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] it is given how the poles and zeros of such an all-pass filter must be positioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, in this exercise the &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;configuration $(5)$&amp;quot; will be examined in more detail, which can be represented by one of the four pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams given in the graph if the parameter &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; is chosen correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Which of the sketched two-port networks are all-pass filters?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which quadripole has the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after a partial fraction decomposition for configuration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Enter the function value for &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for the configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Which statements are true here?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same zeros as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the same poles as &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- The constant factor of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solutions 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*According to the criteria given in exercise 3.4Z, there is always an all-pass filter at hand if there is a zero &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the right half-plane for each pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the left $p$&amp;amp;ndash;half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist dann die Dämpfungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Aus der Grafik auf der Angabenseite erkennt man: &amp;amp;nbsp; Die Konfigurationen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ und &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ erfüllen genau diese Symmetrieeigenschaften.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; suggested solution 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also described by configuration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as the following calculation shows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42500</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42500"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T06:58:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pole-zero diagrams]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph, four two-port networks are given by their pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero diagrams &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They all have in common that the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; of zeros is equal to the number &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; of poles. &lt;br /&gt;
*The constant factor in each case is &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the special case &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; the residue theorem cannot be applied directly to compute the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather, a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
must be made beforehand. Then, &lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$ holds for the impulse response.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the inverse Laplace transform of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, where the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp; is satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four configurations given are so-called &#039;&#039;all-pass filters&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*This refers to two-port networks for which the Fourier spectral function satisfies the condition &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] ist angegeben, wie die Pole und Nullstelle eines solchen Allpasses liegen müssen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weiterhin soll in dieser Aufgabe die &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;Übertragungsfunktion&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Konfiguration $(5)$&amp;quot; näher untersucht werden, die bei richtiger Wahl des Parameters &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; durch eines der vier in der Grafik vorgegebenen Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Diagramme dargestellt werden kann.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweise:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Bei welchen der skizzierten Vierpole handelt es sich um Allpässe?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Welcher Vierpol hat die Übertragungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie die Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nach einer Partialbruchzerlegung für die Konfiguration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Geben Sie den Funktionswert für &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; ein.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie  &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Nach den in der Aufgabe 3.4Z angegebenen Kriterien liegt immer dann ein Allpass vor, wenn es zu jeder Polstelle &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp;  in der linken $p$&amp;amp;ndash;Halbebene eine entsprechende Nullstelle &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in der rechten Halbebene gibt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist dann die Dämpfungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Aus der Grafik auf der Angabenseite erkennt man: &amp;amp;nbsp; Die Konfigurationen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ und &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ erfüllen genau diese Symmetrieeigenschaften.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig ist der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Übertragungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; wird ebenso durch die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; beschrieben, wie die nachfolgende Rechnung zeigt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42499</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42499"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T06:48:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pol–Nullstellen–Diagramme]]&lt;br /&gt;
In der Grafik sind vier Vierpole durch ihre Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Diagramme &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gegeben.&lt;br /&gt;
* Sie alle haben gemein, dass die Anzahl &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Nullstellen gleich der Anzahl &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Polstellen ist. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der konstante Faktor ist jeweils &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im Sonderfall &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; kann zur Berechnung der Impulsantwort &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Residuensatz nicht direkt angewendet werden. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vielmehr muss vorher eine Partialbruchzerlegung entsprechend&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
vorgenommen werden. Für die Impulsantwort gilt dann&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist die Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Rücktransformierte von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, bei der die Bedingung &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp;  erfüllt ist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bei zwei der vier angegebenen Konfigurationen handelt es sich um so genannte &#039;&#039;Allpässe&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*Darunter versteht man Vierpole, bei denen die Fourier&amp;amp;ndash;Spektralfunktion die Bedingung &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; erfüllt. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.4Z:_Various_All-Pass_Filters|Exercise 3.4Z]] ist angegeben, wie die Pole und Nullstelle eines solchen Allpasses liegen müssen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weiterhin soll in dieser Aufgabe die &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;Übertragungsfunktion&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Konfiguration $(5)$&amp;quot; näher untersucht werden, die bei richtiger Wahl des Parameters &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; durch eines der vier in der Grafik vorgegebenen Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Diagramme dargestellt werden kann.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweise:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Bei welchen der skizzierten Vierpole handelt es sich um Allpässe?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Welcher Vierpol hat die Übertragungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie die Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nach einer Partialbruchzerlegung für die Konfiguration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Geben Sie den Funktionswert für &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; ein.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie  &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Nach den in der Aufgabe 3.4Z angegebenen Kriterien liegt immer dann ein Allpass vor, wenn es zu jeder Polstelle &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp;  in der linken $p$&amp;amp;ndash;Halbebene eine entsprechende Nullstelle &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in der rechten Halbebene gibt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist dann die Dämpfungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Aus der Grafik auf der Angabenseite erkennt man: &amp;amp;nbsp; Die Konfigurationen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ und &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ erfüllen genau diese Symmetrieeigenschaften.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig ist der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Übertragungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; wird ebenso durch die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; beschrieben, wie die nachfolgende Rechnung zeigt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42498</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42498"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T06:46:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pol–Nullstellen–Diagramme]]&lt;br /&gt;
In der Grafik sind vier Vierpole durch ihre Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Diagramme &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gegeben.&lt;br /&gt;
* Sie alle haben gemein, dass die Anzahl &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Nullstellen gleich der Anzahl &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Polstellen ist. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der konstante Faktor ist jeweils &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im Sonderfall &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; kann zur Berechnung der Impulsantwort &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Residuensatz nicht direkt angewendet werden. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vielmehr muss vorher eine Partialbruchzerlegung entsprechend&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
vorgenommen werden. Für die Impulsantwort gilt dann&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist die Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Rücktransformierte von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, bei der die Bedingung &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp;  erfüllt ist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bei zwei der vier angegebenen Konfigurationen handelt es sich um so genannte &#039;&#039;Allpässe&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*Darunter versteht man Vierpole, bei denen die Fourier&amp;amp;ndash;Spektralfunktion die Bedingung &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; erfüllt. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:3.4Z_Verschiedene_Allpässe|Aufgabe 3.4Z]] ist angegeben, wie die Pole und Nullstelle eines solchen Allpasses liegen müssen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weiterhin soll in dieser Aufgabe die &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;Übertragungsfunktion&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Konfiguration $(5)$&amp;quot; näher untersucht werden, die bei richtiger Wahl des Parameters &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; durch eines der vier in der Grafik vorgegebenen Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Diagramme dargestellt werden kann.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweise:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In particular, reference is made to the page&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Partial_fraction_decomposition|Partial fraction decomposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Bei welchen der skizzierten Vierpole handelt es sich um Allpässe?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Welcher Vierpol hat die Übertragungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie die Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nach einer Partialbruchzerlegung für die Konfiguration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Geben Sie den Funktionswert für &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; ein.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie  &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Nach den in der Aufgabe 3.4Z angegebenen Kriterien liegt immer dann ein Allpass vor, wenn es zu jeder Polstelle &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp;  in der linken $p$&amp;amp;ndash;Halbebene eine entsprechende Nullstelle &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in der rechten Halbebene gibt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist dann die Dämpfungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Aus der Grafik auf der Angabenseite erkennt man: &amp;amp;nbsp; Die Konfigurationen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ und &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ erfüllen genau diese Symmetrieeigenschaften.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig ist der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Übertragungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; wird ebenso durch die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; beschrieben, wie die nachfolgende Rechnung zeigt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42497</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition&amp;diff=42497"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T06:43:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1789__LZI_Z_3_7.png|right|frame|Pol–Nullstellen–Diagramme]]&lt;br /&gt;
In der Grafik sind vier Vierpole durch ihre Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Diagramme &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gegeben.&lt;br /&gt;
* Sie alle haben gemein, dass die Anzahl &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Nullstellen gleich der Anzahl &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Polstellen ist. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der konstante Faktor ist jeweils &amp;amp;nbsp;$K=1$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im Sonderfall &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$&amp;amp;nbsp; kann zur Berechnung der Impulsantwort &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Residuensatz nicht direkt angewendet werden. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vielmehr muss vorher eine Partialbruchzerlegung entsprechend&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
vorgenommen werden. Für die Impulsantwort gilt dann&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist die Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Rücktransformierte von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;, bei der die Bedingung &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$&amp;amp;nbsp;  erfüllt ist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bei zwei der vier angegebenen Konfigurationen handelt es sich um so genannte &#039;&#039;Allpässe&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*Darunter versteht man Vierpole, bei denen die Fourier&amp;amp;ndash;Spektralfunktion die Bedingung &amp;amp;nbsp;$|H(f)| = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $a(f) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; erfüllt. &lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Aufgaben:3.4Z_Verschiedene_Allpässe|Aufgabe 3.4Z]] ist angegeben, wie die Pole und Nullstelle eines solchen Allpasses liegen müssen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weiterhin soll in dieser Aufgabe die &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;ndash;Übertragungsfunktion&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) =\frac{p/A}{\left (\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p} \right )^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Konfiguration $(5)$&amp;quot; näher untersucht werden, die bei richtiger Wahl des Parameters &amp;amp;nbsp;$A$&amp;amp;nbsp; durch eines der vier in der Grafik vorgegebenen Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Diagramme dargestellt werden kann.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweise:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Bezug genommen wird insbesondere auf die Seite&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace–Rücktransformation#Partialbruchzerlegung|Partialbruchzerlegung]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Bei welchen der skizzierten Vierpole handelt es sich um Allpässe?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Welcher Vierpol hat die Übertragungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;()&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$,&lt;br /&gt;
- Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie die Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nach einer Partialbruchzerlegung für die Konfiguration&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Geben Sie den Funktionswert für &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; ein.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p = 0) \ = \ $  { 2 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie  &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Welche Aussagen treffen hier zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Nullstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitzt die gleichen Polstellen wie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
- Der konstante Faktor von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 8$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Nach den in der Aufgabe 3.4Z angegebenen Kriterien liegt immer dann ein Allpass vor, wenn es zu jeder Polstelle &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = - A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp;  in der linken $p$&amp;amp;ndash;Halbebene eine entsprechende Nullstelle &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = + A + {\rm j} \cdot B$&amp;amp;nbsp; in der rechten Halbebene gibt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $K = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist dann die Dämpfungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$a(f) = 0 \ \rm  Np$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; $|H(f)| = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Aus der Grafik auf der Angabenseite erkennt man: &amp;amp;nbsp; Die Konfigurationen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$ und &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$ erfüllen genau diese Symmetrieeigenschaften.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig ist der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Übertragungsfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; wird ebenso durch die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$&amp;amp;nbsp; beschrieben, wie die nachfolgende Rechnung zeigt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(5)}(p) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{p/A}{(\sqrt{p/A}+\sqrt{A/p})^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 =\frac{p/A}{{p/A}+2+ {A/p}}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2}{p^2 + 2A \cdot p + A^2} = \frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }= H_{\rm L}^{(4)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die doppelte Nullstelle liegt bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = 0$, der doppelte Pol bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -A = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(1)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p-2}{p+2}=\frac{p+2-4}{p+2}= 1 - \frac{4}{p+2}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = \frac{4}{p+2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p =0)&lt;br /&gt;
 =2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; In gleicher Weise ergibt sich für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(2)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{(p-2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p-2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 -4\cdot p  +8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=&lt;br /&gt;
    \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p&lt;br /&gt;
 +8} =1- \frac{8\cdot p}{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 8&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig sind also die &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; im Gegensatz zur Aussage 1:&lt;br /&gt;
* Während &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zwei konjugiert&amp;amp;ndash;komplexe Nullstellen aufweist, &lt;br /&gt;
*besitzt &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; nur eine einzige Nullstelle bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(3)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{p^2 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8 -4\cdot p  -8 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +8}&lt;br /&gt;
 = 1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+2}{(p+2 - {\rm j} \cdot 2)(p+2 + {\rm j} \cdot 2)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Nullstelle von &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; liegt nun bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = -2$.&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Konstante ist &amp;amp;nbsp;$K\hspace{0.01cm}&#039; = 4$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;#8658; &amp;amp;nbsp; richtig ist hier nur der &amp;lt;u&amp;gt; Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Schließlich gilt für die Konfiguration &amp;amp;nbsp;$(4)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =  \frac{p^2 }{(p+2)^2}=\frac{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4 -4\cdot p  -4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
  = 1- \frac{4\cdot p  +4 }{p^2 +4\cdot p  +4}&lt;br /&gt;
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.05cm}&#039;(p)  = 4&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot \frac{p+1}{(p+2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Richtig ist auch hier &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der Lösungsvorschlag 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Allgemein lässt sich sagen: &lt;br /&gt;
*Durch die Partialbruchzerlegung wird die Anzahl und die Lage der Nullstellen verändert. &lt;br /&gt;
*Die Pole von $H_{\rm L}\hspace{0.01cm}&#039;(p)$ sind dagegen stets identisch mit denen von $H_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42496</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7: Impulse Response of a High-Pass Filter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42496"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T06:38:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_A_3_7.png|right|frame|High-pass filter of second-order]]&lt;br /&gt;
We assume the sketched arrangement.&amp;amp;nbsp; The transfer functions of the two identical high-pass filters are:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p}{p+A}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Since the two-port networks are decoupled in terms of resistance by an isolation amplifier, the total transfer function can be written as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time it is known that the following equation is valid:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
If this function is represented in pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero notation, it will turn out that here the number of zeros &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the number of poles &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&amp;amp;nbsp; Therefore, a direct application of the residue theorem is not possible here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, in order to compute the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
must be made. Thus, the following holds for the impulse response:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$ holds with respect to &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. Thus, the continuous component &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the impulse response can be determined using the residue theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The residual of an &amp;amp;nbsp;$l$&amp;amp;ndash;fold pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x}$&amp;amp;nbsp; within the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{(l-1)!}\cdot \frac{{\rm d}^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}{{\rm d}p^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{\rm x})^{\hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The derivative of the product &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(x) = f(x)  \cdot g(x)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is given as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}y(x)}}{{\rm d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}= \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}f(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot g(x) + \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}g(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot f(x)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Represent &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero notation. &amp;amp;nbsp;How many zeros &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and poles &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are there? &amp;amp;nbsp;What is the constant factor &amp;amp;nbsp;$K$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$Z \hspace{0.28cm} = \ $  { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$N \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$K \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 1 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{What is the parameter $A$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the two partial two-port networks?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$A \ =  \ $ { 0.5 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Convert &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p) = 1 - H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp;What result is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p^2/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = (p+0.25)/(p+0.5)^2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$. &amp;amp;nbsp;What are the numerical values for the given times?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 0) \ = \ $  { 1 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 1) \ = \ $ { 0.455 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t &amp;amp;#8594; &amp;amp;#8734;)\ =  \ $ { 0. }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Starting from the given equation,&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be transformed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}=\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +1/4}=\frac{p^2}{(p +1/2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ Z = 2\hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.2cm}N = 2\hspace{0.05cm} ,&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.2cm}K = 1}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The total transfer function is as follows according to the information page:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
A comparison with the result of subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; shows that&amp;amp;nbsp; $\underline{A = 0.5}$&amp;amp;nbsp; must hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;last suggested solution&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained based on the equation computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +0.25}= \frac{p^2 + p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}- \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}\hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p) = \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}= \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Concerning the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; = 1$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$N&#039; = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 1$ hold. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -0.5$&amp;amp;nbsp; coincide such that only one residual needs to be determined:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{ \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2} \cdot (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2 \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{  (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25) \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1788__LZI_A_3_7_d.png|right|frame|Impulse response of the high-pass filter (red); &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;continuous component $h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$ (blue)]]&lt;br /&gt;
The following is obtained using the product rule of differential calculus:&lt;br /&gt;
$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.15cm}  =  \hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
   {\rm e}^{p  \hspace{0.05cm}t} + ( p + 0.25) \cdot t \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p  \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5} &lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.15cm} (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$&lt;br /&gt;
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 0) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline{1}\hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 1) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {0.455}\hspace{0.05cm} \hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} &lt;br /&gt;
 h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t \rightarrow \infty) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {= 0}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows in each case for non&amp;amp;ndash;negative times &lt;br /&gt;
*the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the equivalent low-pass filter as a blue curve,&lt;br /&gt;
*the total impulse response of the considered high-pass filter as a red curve:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
   \delta (t) - (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42495</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7: Impulse Response of a High-Pass Filter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42495"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T06:32:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_A_3_7.png|right|frame|High-pass filter of second-order]]&lt;br /&gt;
We assume the sketched arrangement.&amp;amp;nbsp; The transfer functions of the two identical high-pass filters are:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p}{p+A}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Since the two-port networks are decoupled in terms of resistance by an isolation amplifier, the total transfer function can be written as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Gleichzeitig ist bekannt, dass folgende Gleichung gültig ist:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
If this function is represented in pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero notation, it will turn out that here the number of zeros &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the number of poles &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&amp;amp;nbsp; Therefore, a direct application of the residue theorem is not possible here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, in order to compute the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
must be made. Thus, the following holds for the impulse response:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$ holds with respect to &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. Thus, the continuous component &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the impulse response can be determined using the residue theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The residual of an &amp;amp;nbsp;$l$&amp;amp;ndash;fold pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x}$&amp;amp;nbsp; within the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{(l-1)!}\cdot \frac{{\rm d}^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}{{\rm d}p^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{\rm x})^{\hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The derivative of the product &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(x) = f(x)  \cdot g(x)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is given as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}y(x)}}{{\rm d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}= \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}f(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot g(x) + \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}g(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot f(x)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Represent &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero notation. &amp;amp;nbsp;How many zeros &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and poles &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are there? &amp;amp;nbsp;What is the constant factor &amp;amp;nbsp;$K$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$Z \hspace{0.28cm} = \ $  { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$N \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$K \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 1 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{What is the parameter $A$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the two partial two-port networks?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$A \ =  \ $ { 0.5 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Convert &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p) = 1 - H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp;What result is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p^2/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = (p+0.25)/(p+0.5)^2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$. &amp;amp;nbsp;What are the numerical values for the given times?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 0) \ = \ $  { 1 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 1) \ = \ $ { 0.455 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t &amp;amp;#8594; &amp;amp;#8734;)\ =  \ $ { 0. }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Starting from the given equation,&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be transformed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}=\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +1/4}=\frac{p^2}{(p +1/2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ Z = 2\hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.2cm}N = 2\hspace{0.05cm} ,&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.2cm}K = 1}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The total transfer function is as follows according to the information page:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
A comparison with the result of subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; shows that&amp;amp;nbsp; $\underline{A = 0.5}$&amp;amp;nbsp; must hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;last suggested solution&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained based on the equation computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +0.25}= \frac{p^2 + p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}- \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}\hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p) = \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}= \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Concerning the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; = 1$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$N&#039; = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 1$ hold. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -0.5$&amp;amp;nbsp; coincide such that only one residual needs to be determined:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{ \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2} \cdot (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2 \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{  (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25) \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1788__LZI_A_3_7_d.png|right|frame|Impulse response of the high-pass filter (red); &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;continuous component $h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$ (blue)]]&lt;br /&gt;
The following is obtained using the product rule of differential calculus:&lt;br /&gt;
$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.15cm}  =  \hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
   {\rm e}^{p  \hspace{0.05cm}t} + ( p + 0.25) \cdot t \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p  \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5} &lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.15cm} (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$&lt;br /&gt;
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 0) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline{1}\hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 1) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {0.455}\hspace{0.05cm} \hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} &lt;br /&gt;
 h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t \rightarrow \infty) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {= 0}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows in each case for non&amp;amp;ndash;negative times &lt;br /&gt;
*the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the equivalent low-pass filter as a blue curve,&lt;br /&gt;
*the total impulse response of the considered high-pass filter as a red curve:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
   \delta (t) - (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42494</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7: Impulse Response of a High-Pass Filter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42494"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T06:26:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_A_3_7.png|right|frame|High-pass filter of second-order]]&lt;br /&gt;
We assume the sketched arrangement.&amp;amp;nbsp; The transfer functions of the two identical high-pass filters are:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p}{p+A}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Since the two-port networks are decoupled in terms of resistance by an isolation amplifier, the total transfer function can be written as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Gleichzeitig ist bekannt, dass folgende Gleichung gültig ist:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
If this function is represented in pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero notation, it will turn out that here the number of zeros &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the number of poles &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&amp;amp;nbsp; Therefore, a direct application of the residue theorem is not possible here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, in order to compute the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
must be made. Thus, the following holds for the impulse response:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$ holds with respect to &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. Thus, the continuous component &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the impulse response can be determined using the residue theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The residual of an &amp;amp;nbsp;$l$&amp;amp;ndash;fold pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x}$&amp;amp;nbsp; within the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{(l-1)!}\cdot \frac{{\rm d}^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}{{\rm d}p^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{\rm x})^{\hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The derivative of the product &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(x) = f(x)  \cdot g(x)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is given as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}y(x)}}{{\rm d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}= \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}f(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot g(x) + \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}g(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot f(x)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Represent &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero notation. &amp;amp;nbsp;How many zeros &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and poles &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are there? &amp;amp;nbsp;What is the constant factor &amp;amp;nbsp;$K$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$Z \hspace{0.28cm} = \ $  { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$N \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$K \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 1 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{What is the parameter $A$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the two partial two-port networks?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$A \ =  \ $ { 0.5 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Convert &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p) = 1 - H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp;What result is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p^2/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = (p+0.25)/(p+0.5)^2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$. &amp;amp;nbsp;What are the numerical values for the given times?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 0) \ = \ $  { 1 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 1) \ = \ $ { 0.455 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t &amp;amp;#8594; &amp;amp;#8734;)\ =  \ $ { 0. }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Starting from the given equation,&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be transformed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}=\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +1/4}=\frac{p^2}{(p +1/2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ Z = 2\hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.2cm}N = 2\hspace{0.05cm} ,&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.2cm}K = 1}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The total transfer function is as follows according to the information page:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
A comparison with the result of subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; shows that&amp;amp;nbsp; $\underline{A = 0.5}$&amp;amp;nbsp; must hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;last suggested solution&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained based on the equation computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +0.25}= \frac{p^2 + p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}- \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}\hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p) = \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}= \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Bezüglich der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; = 1$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$N&#039; = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Die beiden Pole bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -0.5$&amp;amp;nbsp; fallen zusammen, so dass nur ein Residium ermittelt werden muss:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{ \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2} \cdot (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2 \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{  (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25) \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1788__LZI_A_3_7_d.png|right|frame|Impulsantwort des Hochpasses (rot); &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;kontinuierlicher Anteil $h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$ (blau)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Mit der Produktregel der Differentialrechnung erhält man:&lt;br /&gt;
$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.15cm}  =  \hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
   {\rm e}^{p  \hspace{0.05cm}t} + ( p + 0.25) \cdot t \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p  \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5} &lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.15cm} (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$&lt;br /&gt;
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 0) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline{1}\hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 1) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {0.455}\hspace{0.05cm} \hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} &lt;br /&gt;
 h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t \rightarrow \infty) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {= 0}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Die Grafik zeigt jeweils für nicht&amp;amp;ndash;negative Zeiten &lt;br /&gt;
*als blaue Kurve die Impulsantwort  &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; des äquivalenten Tiefpasses,&lt;br /&gt;
*als rote Kurve die gesamte Impulsantwort des betrachteten Hochpasses:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
   \delta (t) - (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42493</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7: Impulse Response of a High-Pass Filter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42493"/>
		<updated>2021-10-26T06:22:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_A_3_7.png|right|frame|High-pass filter of second-order]]&lt;br /&gt;
We assume the sketched arrangement.&amp;amp;nbsp; The transfer functions of the two identical high-pass filters are:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p}{p+A}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Since the two-port networks are decoupled in terms of resistance by an isolation amplifier, the total transfer function can be written as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Gleichzeitig ist bekannt, dass folgende Gleichung gültig ist:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
If this function is represented in pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero notation, it will turn out that here the number of zeros &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the number of poles &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&amp;amp;nbsp; Therefore, a direct application of the residue theorem is not possible here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, in order to compute the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; a partial fraction decomposition corresponding to&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
must be made. Thus, the following holds for the impulse response:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$ holds with respect to &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. Thus, the continuous component &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the impulse response can be determined using the residue theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The residual of an &amp;amp;nbsp;$l$&amp;amp;ndash;fold pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x}$&amp;amp;nbsp; within the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{(l-1)!}\cdot \frac{{\rm d}^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}{{\rm d}p^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{\rm x})^{\hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The derivative of the product &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(x) = f(x)  \cdot g(x)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is given as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}y(x)}}{{\rm d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}= \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}f(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot g(x) + \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}g(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot f(x)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Represent &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in pole&amp;amp;ndash;zero notation. &amp;amp;nbsp;How many zeros &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and poles &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are there? &amp;amp;nbsp;What is the constant factor &amp;amp;nbsp;$K$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$Z \hspace{0.28cm} = \ $  { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$N \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$K \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 1 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{What is the parameter $A$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the two partial two-port networks?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$A \ =  \ $ { 0.5 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Convert &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p) = 1 - H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp;What result is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p^2/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = (p+0.25)/(p+0.5)^2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$. &amp;amp;nbsp;What are the numerical values for the given times?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 0) \ = \ $  { 1 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 1) \ = \ $ { 0.455 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t &amp;amp;#8594; &amp;amp;#8734;)\ =  \ $ { 0. }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Starting from the given equation,&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be transformed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}=\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +1/4}=\frac{p^2}{(p +1/2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ Z = 2\hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.2cm}N = 2\hspace{0.05cm} ,&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.2cm}K = 1}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Die Gesamtübertragungsfunktion lautet entsprechend der Angabe:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Ein Vergleich mit dem Ergebnis der Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass&amp;amp;nbsp; $\underline{A = 0.5}$&amp;amp;nbsp; sein muss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig ist &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der letzte Lösungsvorschlag&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ausgehend von der in der Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; berechneten Gleichung erhält man&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +0.25}= \frac{p^2 + p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}- \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}\hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p) = \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}= \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Bezüglich der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; = 1$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$N&#039; = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Die beiden Pole bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -0.5$&amp;amp;nbsp; fallen zusammen, so dass nur ein Residium ermittelt werden muss:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{ \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2} \cdot (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2 \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{  (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25) \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1788__LZI_A_3_7_d.png|right|frame|Impulsantwort des Hochpasses (rot); &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;kontinuierlicher Anteil $h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$ (blau)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Mit der Produktregel der Differentialrechnung erhält man:&lt;br /&gt;
$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.15cm}  =  \hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
   {\rm e}^{p  \hspace{0.05cm}t} + ( p + 0.25) \cdot t \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p  \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5} &lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.15cm} (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$&lt;br /&gt;
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 0) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline{1}\hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 1) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {0.455}\hspace{0.05cm} \hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} &lt;br /&gt;
 h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t \rightarrow \infty) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {= 0}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Die Grafik zeigt jeweils für nicht&amp;amp;ndash;negative Zeiten &lt;br /&gt;
*als blaue Kurve die Impulsantwort  &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; des äquivalenten Tiefpasses,&lt;br /&gt;
*als rote Kurve die gesamte Impulsantwort des betrachteten Hochpasses:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
   \delta (t) - (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42467</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7: Impulse Response of a High-Pass Filter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42467"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:19:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_A_3_7.png|right|frame|High-pass filter of second-order]]&lt;br /&gt;
Wir gehen von der skizzierten Anordnung aus.&amp;amp;nbsp; Die Übertragungsfunktionen der beiden identischen Hochpässe lauten:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p}{p+A}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Da die Vierpole durch einen Trennverstärker widerstandsmäßig entkoppelt sind, lässt sich für die Gesamtübertragungsfunktion schreiben:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Gleichzeitig ist bekannt, dass folgende Gleichung gültig ist:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Stellt man diese Funktion in Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Form dar, so wird sich herausstellen, dass hier die Anzahl der Nullstellen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gleich der Anzahl der Pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist.&amp;amp;nbsp; Eine direkte Anwendung des Residuensatzes ist hier deshalb nicht möglich.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Um die Zeitfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; berechnen zu können, muss vielmehr eine Partialbruchzerlegung entsprechend&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
vorgenommen werden. Damit gilt für die Impulsantwort:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Bezüglich &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$. Somit kann der kontinuierliche Anteil &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Impulsantwort  mit dem Residuensatz ermittelt werden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Das Residium eines &amp;amp;nbsp;$l$&amp;amp;ndash;fachen Pols &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x}$&amp;amp;nbsp; innerhalb der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; lautet:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{(l-1)!}\cdot \frac{{\rm d}^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}{{\rm d}p^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{\rm x})^{\hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Ableitung des Produkts &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(x) = f(x)  \cdot g(x)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist wie folgt gegeben:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}y(x)}}{{\rm d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}= \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}f(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot g(x) + \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}g(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot f(x)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Stellen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Form dar. &amp;amp;nbsp;Wieviele Nullstellen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; und Pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gibt es? &amp;amp;nbsp;Wie groß ist der konstante Faktor &amp;amp;nbsp;$K$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$Z \hspace{0.28cm} = \ $  { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$N \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$K \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 1 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Wie groß ist der Parameter $A$&amp;amp;nbsp; der beiden Teilvierpolen?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$A \ =  \ $ { 0.5 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Wandeln Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p) = 1 - H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; um. &amp;amp;nbsp;Welches Ergebnis erhält man für &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p^2/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = (p+0.25)/(p+0.5)^2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie die Zeitfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$. &amp;amp;nbsp;Welche Zahlenwerte ergeben sich für die angegebenen Zeitpunkte?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 0) \ = \ $  { 1 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 1) \ = \ $ { 0.455 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t &amp;amp;#8594; &amp;amp;#8734;)\ =  \ $ { 0. }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Ausgehend von der vorgegebenen Gleichung kann&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; wie folgt umgeformt werden:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}=\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +1/4}=\frac{p^2}{(p +1/2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ Z = 2\hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.2cm}N = 2\hspace{0.05cm} ,&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.2cm}K = 1}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Die Gesamtübertragungsfunktion lautet entsprechend der Angabe:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Ein Vergleich mit dem Ergebnis der Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass&amp;amp;nbsp; $\underline{A = 0.5}$&amp;amp;nbsp; sein muss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig ist &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der letzte Lösungsvorschlag&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ausgehend von der in der Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; berechneten Gleichung erhält man&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +0.25}= \frac{p^2 + p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}- \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}\hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p) = \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}= \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Bezüglich der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; = 1$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$N&#039; = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Die beiden Pole bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -0.5$&amp;amp;nbsp; fallen zusammen, so dass nur ein Residium ermittelt werden muss:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{ \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2} \cdot (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2 \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{  (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25) \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1788__LZI_A_3_7_d.png|right|frame|Impulsantwort des Hochpasses (rot); &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;kontinuierlicher Anteil $h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$ (blau)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Mit der Produktregel der Differentialrechnung erhält man:&lt;br /&gt;
$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.15cm}  =  \hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
   {\rm e}^{p  \hspace{0.05cm}t} + ( p + 0.25) \cdot t \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p  \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5} &lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.15cm} (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$&lt;br /&gt;
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 0) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline{1}\hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 1) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {0.455}\hspace{0.05cm} \hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} &lt;br /&gt;
 h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t \rightarrow \infty) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {= 0}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Die Grafik zeigt jeweils für nicht&amp;amp;ndash;negative Zeiten &lt;br /&gt;
*als blaue Kurve die Impulsantwort  &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; des äquivalenten Tiefpasses,&lt;br /&gt;
*als rote Kurve die gesamte Impulsantwort des betrachteten Hochpasses:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
   \delta (t) - (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42466</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.7: Impulse Response of a High-Pass Filter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter&amp;diff=42466"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:18:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_A_3_7.png|right|frame|Hochpass zweiter Ordnung]]&lt;br /&gt;
Wir gehen von der skizzierten Anordnung aus.&amp;amp;nbsp; Die Übertragungsfunktionen der beiden identischen Hochpässe lauten:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p}{p+A}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Da die Vierpole durch einen Trennverstärker widerstandsmäßig entkoppelt sind, lässt sich für die Gesamtübertragungsfunktion schreiben:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Gleichzeitig ist bekannt, dass folgende Gleichung gültig ist:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Stellt man diese Funktion in Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Form dar, so wird sich herausstellen, dass hier die Anzahl der Nullstellen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gleich der Anzahl der Pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist.&amp;amp;nbsp; Eine direkte Anwendung des Residuensatzes ist hier deshalb nicht möglich.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Um die Zeitfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; berechnen zu können, muss vielmehr eine Partialbruchzerlegung entsprechend&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
$H_{\rm L}(p)  =1- H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
vorgenommen werden. Damit gilt für die Impulsantwort:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t)  = \delta(t)- h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Bezüglich &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; &amp;lt; N&#039;$. Somit kann der kontinuierliche Anteil &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; der Impulsantwort  mit dem Residuensatz ermittelt werden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Das Residium eines &amp;amp;nbsp;$l$&amp;amp;ndash;fachen Pols &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x}$&amp;amp;nbsp; innerhalb der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; lautet:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{(l-1)!}\cdot \frac{{\rm d}^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}{{\rm d}p^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1}}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{\rm x})^{\hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Ableitung des Produkts &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(x) = f(x)  \cdot g(x)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist wie folgt gegeben:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}y(x)}}{{\rm d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}= \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}f(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot g(x) + \frac{{\rm d}{\hspace{0.05cm}g(x)}}{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}\hspace{0.05cm}x}\cdot f(x)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Stellen Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in Pol&amp;amp;ndash;Nullstellen&amp;amp;ndash;Form dar. &amp;amp;nbsp;Wieviele Nullstellen &amp;amp;nbsp;$(Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; und Pole &amp;amp;nbsp;$(N)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gibt es? &amp;amp;nbsp;Wie groß ist der konstante Faktor &amp;amp;nbsp;$K$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$Z \hspace{0.28cm} = \ $  { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$N \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 2 }&lt;br /&gt;
$K \hspace{0.2cm} = \ $ { 1 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Wie groß ist der Parameter $A$&amp;amp;nbsp; der beiden Teilvierpolen?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$A \ =  \ $ { 0.5 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Wandeln Sie &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p) = 1 - H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; um. &amp;amp;nbsp;Welches Ergebnis erhält man für &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p^2/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
- $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = p/(p+0.5)^2$,&lt;br /&gt;
+ $H_{\rm L}&#039;(p) = (p+0.25)/(p+0.5)^2$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie die Zeitfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$. &amp;amp;nbsp;Welche Zahlenwerte ergeben sich für die angegebenen Zeitpunkte?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 0) \ = \ $  { 1 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t = 1) \ = \ $ { 0.455 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$h&#039;(t &amp;amp;#8594; &amp;amp;#8734;)\ =  \ $ { 0. }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Ausgehend von der vorgegebenen Gleichung kann&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; wie folgt umgeformt werden:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{4}{1/p^2 + 4/p +4}=\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +1/4}=\frac{p^2}{(p +1/2)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ Z = 2\hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.2cm}N = 2\hspace{0.05cm} ,&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.2cm}K = 1}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Die Gesamtübertragungsfunktion lautet entsprechend der Angabe:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}^{(1)}(p) \cdot H_{\rm L}^{(2)}(p) =\frac{p^2}{(p+A)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Ein Vergleich mit dem Ergebnis der Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass&amp;amp;nbsp; $\underline{A = 0.5}$&amp;amp;nbsp; sein muss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig ist &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;der letzte Lösungsvorschlag&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ausgehend von der in der Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; berechneten Gleichung erhält man&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)  =\frac{p^2}{p^2 + p +0.25}= \frac{p^2 + p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}- \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}\hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p) = \frac{p +0.25}{p^2 + p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25}= \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Bezüglich der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}&#039;(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z&#039; = 1$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$N&#039; = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$K&#039; = 1$. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Die beiden Pole bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = -0.5$&amp;amp;nbsp; fallen zusammen, so dass nur ein Residium ermittelt werden muss:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}\hspace{-0.05cm}&#039;(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
  \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{ \frac{p +0.25}{(p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2} \cdot (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.5)^2 \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.2cm}\frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{  (p&lt;br /&gt;
 +0.25) \cdot  {\rm e}^{p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1788__LZI_A_3_7_d.png|right|frame|Impulsantwort des Hochpasses (rot); &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;kontinuierlicher Anteil $h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t)$ (blau)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Mit der Produktregel der Differentialrechnung erhält man:&lt;br /&gt;
$$h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t) \hspace{0.15cm}  =  \hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
   {\rm e}^{p  \hspace{0.05cm}t} + ( p + 0.25) \cdot t \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p  \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.5} &lt;br /&gt;
  =  \hspace{0.15cm} (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$&lt;br /&gt;
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 0) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline{1}\hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t = 1) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {0.455}\hspace{0.05cm} \hspace{0.05cm} ,\hspace{0.3cm} &lt;br /&gt;
 h\hspace{0.03cm}&#039;(t \rightarrow \infty) \hspace{0.15cm}  =   \underline {= 0}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Die Grafik zeigt jeweils für nicht&amp;amp;ndash;negative Zeiten &lt;br /&gt;
*als blaue Kurve die Impulsantwort  &amp;amp;nbsp;$h&#039;(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; des äquivalenten Tiefpasses,&lt;br /&gt;
*als rote Kurve die gesamte Impulsantwort des betrachteten Hochpasses:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
   \delta (t) - (1- {t}/{4})&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot{\rm e}^{-t/2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42465</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42465"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:15:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace tansform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
is considered, in particular the limiting case for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The frequency variable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is normalized such that time&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; is in microseconds after applying the residue theorem. &lt;br /&gt;
*A result &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus to be interpreted as &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; with &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; is as follows using the example of the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with two simple poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of $x(t)$ is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is cosine-shaped.&lt;br /&gt;
- For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is sinusoidal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The limiting case &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1, 3 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained for signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for positive times by applying the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 2 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*In principle, this subtask could be solved in the same way as subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, the integration theorem can also be used. &lt;br /&gt;
*This says among other things that multiplication by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the spectral domain corresponds to integration in the time domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; The causal cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and the causal sine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are shown on the information page of&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior|Exercise 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; as&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*A comparison with the computation of &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; shows that &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; holds for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The limit process for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; thus results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same result is obtained by consideration in the spectral domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42464</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42464"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:14:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace tansform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
is considered, in particular the limiting case for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The frequency variable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is normalized such that time&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; is in microseconds after applying the residue theorem. &lt;br /&gt;
*A result &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus to be interpreted as &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; with &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; is as follows using the example of the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with two simple poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of $x(t)$ is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is cosine-shaped.&lt;br /&gt;
- For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is sinusoidal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The limiting case &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1, 3 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained for signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for positive times by applying the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 2 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*In principle, this subtask could be solved in the same way as subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, the integration theorem can also be used. &lt;br /&gt;
*This says among other things that multiplication by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the spectral domain corresponds to integration in the time domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; The causal cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and the causal sine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are shown on the information page of&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior|Exercise 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*A comparison with the computation of &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; shows that &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; holds for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The limit process for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; thus results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same result is obtained by consideration in the spectral domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42463</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42463"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:12:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace tansform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
is considered, in particular the limiting case for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The frequency variable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is normalized such that time&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; is in microseconds after applying the residue theorem. &lt;br /&gt;
*A result &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus to be interpreted as &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; with &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; is as follows using the example of the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with two simple poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of $x(t)$ is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is cosine-shaped.&lt;br /&gt;
- For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is sinusoidal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The limiting case &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1, 3 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained for signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for positive times by applying the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 2 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*In principle, this subtask could be solved in the same way as subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, the integration theorem can also be used. &lt;br /&gt;
*This says among other things that multiplication by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the spectral domain corresponds to integration in the time domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; The causal cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and the causal sine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are shown on the information page of&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior|Exercise 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*A comparison with the computation of &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; shows that &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; holds for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The limit process for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; thus results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same result is obtained by consideration in the spectral domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42462</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42462"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:11:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace tansform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
is considered, in particular the limiting case for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The frequency variable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is normalized such that time&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; is in microseconds after applying the residue theorem. &lt;br /&gt;
*A result &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus to be interpreted as &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; with &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; is as follows using the example of the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with two simple poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The amplitude ofn&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of $x(t)$ is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is cosine-shaped.&lt;br /&gt;
- For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is sinusoidal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The limiting case &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1, 3 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained for signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for positive times by applying the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 2 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*In principle, this subtask could be solved in the same way as subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, the integration theorem can also be used. &lt;br /&gt;
*This says among other things that multiplication by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the spectral domain corresponds to integration in the time domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; The causal cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and the causal sine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are shown on the information page of&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior|Exercise 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*A comparison with the computation of &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; shows that &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; holds for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The limit process for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; thus results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same result is obtained by consideration in the spectral domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42461</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42461"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:10:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace tansform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
is considered, in particular the limiting case for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The frequency variable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is normalized such that time&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; is in microseconds after applying the residue theorem. &lt;br /&gt;
*A result &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus to be interpreted as &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; with &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; is as follows using the example of the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with two simple poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The amplitude ofn&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of $x(t)$ is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is cosine-shaped.&lt;br /&gt;
- For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is sinusoidal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The limiting case &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1, 3 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained for signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for positive times by applying the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 2 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*In principle, this subtask could be solved in the same way as subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, the integration theorem can also be used. &lt;br /&gt;
*This says among other things that multiplication by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the spectral domain corresponds to integration in the time domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; The causal cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and the causal sine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are shown on the information page of&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior|Exercise 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1 and 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*A comparison with the computation of &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; shows that &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; holds for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; holds for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The limit process for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; thus results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same result is obtained by consideration in the spectral domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&amp;diff=42460</id>
		<title>Linear and Time Invariant Systems/Inverse Laplace Transform</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&amp;diff=42460"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:04:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
{{Header&lt;br /&gt;
|Untermenü=Beschreibung kausaler realisierbarer Systeme&lt;br /&gt;
|Vorherige Seite=Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function&lt;br /&gt;
|Nächste Seite=Some_Results_from_Transmission_Line_Theory&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Problem formulation and prerequisites==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{BlaueBox|TEXT=  &lt;br /&gt;
$\text{Task:}$&amp;amp;nbsp; This chapter deals with the following problem: &lt;br /&gt;
*The&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$–spectral function&amp;amp;nbsp; $Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;  is given in&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;pole-zero&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; notation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;inverse Laplace transform&#039;&#039;&#039;, i.e. the associated time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is searched-for,&amp;amp;nbsp; where the following notation should hold:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y(t) = {\rm L}^{-1}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\}\hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm briefly}\hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 y(t) \quad \circ\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\bullet\quad Y_{\rm L}(p)\hspace{0.05cm} .$$}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_T_3_3_S1.png |right|frame|Prerequisites for the chapter &amp;quot;Inverse Laplace Transform&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The graph summarizes the prerequisites for this task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; describes the transfer function of the causal system and &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; specifies the Laplace transform of the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; considering the input signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is characterized by &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; poles,&amp;amp;nbsp; by &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z ≤ N$&amp;amp;nbsp; zeros and by the constant &amp;amp;nbsp;$K.$ &lt;br /&gt;
*Poles and zeros exhibit the properties mentioned in the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function#Properties_of_poles_and_zeros|last chapter]]:&amp;amp;nbsp; Poles are only allowed in the left &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$–half plane or on the imaginary axis;&amp;amp;nbsp; zeros are also allowed in the right &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$–half plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*All singularities – this is the generic term for poles and zeros – are either real or exist as pairs of conjugate-complex singularities.&amp;amp;nbsp; Multiple poles and zeros are also allowed. &lt;br /&gt;
*With the input &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t) = δ(t)$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp;  $X_{\rm L}(p) = 1$  &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp;  $Y_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}(p)$, the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; then describes the [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/System_Description_in_Time_Domain#Impulse_response|impulse response]]  &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the transmission system.&amp;amp;nbsp; For this purpose, only the singularities drawn in green in the graph may be used for computation. &lt;br /&gt;
*A step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t) = γ(t)$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp;  $ X_{\rm L} = 1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the input causes the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; to be equal to the &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/System_Description_in_Time_Domain#Step_response|step response]] &amp;amp;nbsp; $σ(t)$ of $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&amp;amp;nbsp; In addition to the singularities of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; the pole (shown in red in the graph) at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; must now also be taken into account for computation. &lt;br /&gt;
*Only signals for which &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{ \rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be expressed in pole-zero notation are possible as input &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (see the &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function#Some_important_Laplace_correspondences|table]]&amp;amp;nbsp; in the chapter &amp;quot;Laplace Transform and $p$–Transfer Function&amp;quot;), for example a cosine or sine signal switched on at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*So, a rectangle as input signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)\ \  ⇒ \ \ X_{\rm L}(p) = (1 - {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} T})/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is not possible in the approach described here.&amp;amp;nbsp; However, the rectangular response &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be computed indirectly as the difference of two step responses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Some results of the theory of functions==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_and_Its_Inverse#The_first_Fourier_integral|Fourier integrals]],&amp;amp;nbsp; which differ only slightly in the two directions of transformation,&amp;amp;nbsp; for&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Laplace&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; the computation of &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; from &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$ – that is the inverse transformation – is&lt;br /&gt;
*much more difficult than computing &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; from &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$, &lt;br /&gt;
*unresolvable or solvable only very laboriously by elementary means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{BlaueBox|TEXT=  &lt;br /&gt;
$\text{Definition:}$&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
In general, the following holds for the&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;inverse Laplace trans&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y(t) = {\rm L}^{-1}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\}= \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm}\rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm}\infty}  \hspace{0.15cm} \frac{1}{ {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi}\cdot     \int_{ \alpha - {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2 \pi \beta } ^{\alpha+{\rm j}  \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2 \pi \beta}  Y_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}p \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The integration is parallel to the imaginary axis. &lt;br /&gt;
*The real part &amp;amp;nbsp;$α$&amp;amp;nbsp; is to be chosen such that all poles are located to the left of the integration path.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_T_3_3_S2.png |right|frame|Line integral together with left and right circular integral]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The left graph illustrates this line integral along the red dotted vertical &amp;amp;nbsp;${\rm Re}\{p\}= α$.&amp;amp;nbsp; This integral is solvable using &amp;amp;nbsp;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan%27s_lemma Jordan&#039;s lemma of complex analysis].&amp;amp;nbsp; In this tutorial only a very short and simple summary of the approach is depicted: &lt;br /&gt;
*The line integral can be divided into two circular integrals so that all poles are located in the left circular integral while the right circular integral may only contain zeros. &lt;br /&gt;
*According to the theory of functions, the right circular integral yields the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for negative times.&amp;amp;nbsp; Due to causality, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t &amp;lt; 0)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero,&amp;amp;nbsp; but according to the fundamental theorem of the theory of functions this is only true if there are no poles in the right &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$–half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast,&amp;amp;nbsp; the integral over the left semicircle yields the time function for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t ≥ 0$.&amp;amp;nbsp; This encloses all poles and can be computed using the&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;residue theorem&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; in a (relatively) simple way,&amp;amp;nbsp; as it will be shown on the next pages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formulation of the residue theorem==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is further assumed that the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be expressed in pole-zero notation  by &lt;br /&gt;
*the constant factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $K$, &lt;br /&gt;
*the &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;zeros&amp;quot; &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm o}i}$&amp;amp;nbsp; $(i = 1$, ... , $Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &lt;br /&gt;
*the &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;poles&amp;quot; &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}i}$&amp;amp;nbsp; $(i = 1$, ... , $N$). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also assume &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z &amp;lt; N$. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of distinguishable poles is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$I$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Multiple poles are counted only once to determine &amp;amp;nbsp;$I$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Thus, the following holds for the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Some_results_of_the_theory_of_functions|sketch]]&amp;amp;nbsp; in the last section considering the  double pole: &amp;amp;nbsp;  $N = 5$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$I = 4$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{BlaueBox|TEXT=  &lt;br /&gt;
$\text{Residue Theorem:}$&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
Considering the above conditions, the&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;inverse Laplace transform&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; of &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t ≥ 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; is obtained as the sum of&amp;amp;nbsp; $I$&amp;amp;nbsp; natural oscillations of the poles,&amp;amp;nbsp; which are called the&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;residuals&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; – abbreviated as &amp;quot;Res&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{I}{\rm Res} \bigg \vert _{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}_i}} \hspace{-0.7cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t}\} \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since&amp;amp;nbsp; $Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is only specifiable for causal signals, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t &amp;lt; 0) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; always holds for negative times. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In general,&amp;amp;nbsp; the following holds for a pole of multiplicity &amp;amp;nbsp;$l$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg \vert _{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x}_i} } \hspace{-0.7cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= \frac{1}{(l-1)!}\cdot \frac{ {\rm d}^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1} }{ {\rm d}p^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1} }\hspace{0.15cm} \left \{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{ {\rm x}_i})^{\hspace{0.05cm}l}\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\} \bigg \vert_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x}_i} } \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained out of it with &amp;amp;nbsp;$l = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; for a simple pole as a special case:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg\vert_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x}_i} } \hspace{-0.7cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{ {\rm x}_i} )\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg \vert _{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x}_i} } \hspace{0.05cm} .$$}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the next pages,&amp;amp;nbsp; the&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;residue theorem&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; is illustrated by three detailed examples corresponding to the three constellations in&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function#Properties_of_poles_and_zeros| $\text{Example 3}$]]&amp;amp;nbsp; in the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Laplace Transform and p-Transfer Function&amp;quot;: &lt;br /&gt;
*So, we consider again the two-port network with an inductance &amp;amp;nbsp;$L = 25 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro;H$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the longitudinal branch as well as the the series connection of an ohmic resistance&amp;amp;nbsp; $R = 50 \ \rm Ω$&amp;amp;nbsp; and a capacitance&amp;amp;nbsp; $C$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the transverse branch. &lt;br /&gt;
*For the latter,&amp;amp;nbsp; we again consider three different values,&amp;amp;nbsp; namely &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 62.5 \ \rm nF$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 8 \ \rm nF$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 40 \ \rm nF$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following is always assumed: &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t) = δ(t) \; ⇒  \; X_{\rm L}(p) = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; $Y_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}(p)$  &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; the output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aperiodically decaying impulse response==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The following is obtained for the&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function computed on the page &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function#Pole-zero_representation_of_circuits|pole-zero representation of circuits]]&amp;amp;nbsp; with the capacitance &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 62.5 \ \rm nF$&amp;amp;nbsp; and the other numerical values given in the graph below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: EN_LZI_T_3_3_S3a.png|right|frame|Aperiodically decaying impulse response]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)= K \cdot \frac {p - p_{\rm o }} {(p - p_{\rm x 1})(p - p_{\rm x 2})}= 2 \cdot \frac {p + 0.32 }&lt;br /&gt;
 {(p +0.4)(p +1.6 )} \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note the normalization of &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$K$ and also of all poles and zeros by the factor &amp;amp;nbsp;${\rm 10^6} · 1/\rm s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The impulse response is composed of &amp;amp;nbsp;$I = N = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; natural oscillations. For $t &amp;lt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; these are equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
*The residual of the pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}1} =\  –0.4$&amp;amp;nbsp; yields the following time function:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h_1(t)  =  {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}} \hspace{-0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{{\rm x}1})\cdot {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
: $$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_1(t)  =  2 \cdot \frac {p + 0.32 } {p +0.4}\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}= - \frac {2 } {15}\cdot  {\rm e}^{-0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} t} \hspace{0.05cm}. $$&lt;br /&gt;
*In the same way, the residual of the second pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}2} = \ –1.6$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be computed:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h_2(t)  =  {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}} \hspace{-0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{{\rm x}2})\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_2(t)  =  2 \cdot \frac {p + 0.32 } {p +1.6}\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-1.6}=  \frac {32 } {15}\cdot  {\rm e}^{-1.6 \hspace{0.05cm} t} \hspace{0.05cm}. $$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows &amp;amp;nbsp;$h_1(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$h_2(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as well as the sum signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The normalization factor &amp;amp;nbsp;$1/T = 10^6 · \rm 1/s$ is taken into account here so that the time is normalized to &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*For &amp;amp;nbsp;$t =0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; $T \cdot h(t=0) =  {32 }/ {15} -{2 }/ {15}= 2 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp; is obtained as a result. &lt;br /&gt;
*For times &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; 2 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$,&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response is negative&amp;amp;nbsp; (although only slightly and difficult to see in the graph).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Attenuated-oscillatory impulse response==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The component values &amp;amp;nbsp;$R = 50 \ \rm Ω$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$L = 25 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; H$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 8 \ \rm nF$ result in two conjugate complex poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}1} = \ –1 + {\rm j} · 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}2} = \ –1 - {\rm j} · 2$.&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_T_3_3_S3b.png|right|frame| Attenuated-oscillatory impulse response]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The zero is located at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = \ –2.5$. &lt;br /&gt;
*$K = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; holds and all numerical values are to be multiplied again by the factor &amp;amp;nbsp;$1/T$&amp;amp;nbsp; $(T = 1\ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When applying the residue theorem to this configuration the following is obtained:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h_1(t) =   K \cdot \frac {p_{\rm x 1} - p_{\rm o }} {p_{\rm x 1} - p_{\rm x 2}} \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 1} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t} $$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_1(t) =    2 \cdot \frac {-1 + {\rm j}\cdot 2 +2.5} {(-1 + {\rm j}\cdot 2) - (-1 - {\rm j}\cdot 2)}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 1}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_1(t) =  2 \cdot \frac {1.5 + {\rm j}\cdot 2} {{\rm j}\cdot 4}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 1} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}= (1 - {\rm j}\cdot 0.75)\cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 e}^{-t}\cdot {\rm  e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 2t} \hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ h_2(t) =   K \cdot \frac {p_{\rm x 2} - p_{\rm o }} {p_{\rm x 2} - p_{\rm x 1}}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 2} \hspace{0.03cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t} $$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} h_2(t) =  2 \cdot \frac {-1 - {\rm j}\cdot 2 +2.5} {(-1 - {\rm j}\cdot 2) - (-1 + {\rm j}\cdot 2)}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 2} \hspace{0.03cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t} $$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_2(t) =2 \cdot \frac {1.5 - {\rm j}\cdot 2} {-{\rm j}\cdot 4}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 2} \hspace{0.03cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}= (1 + {\rm j}\cdot 0.75)\cdot {\rm e}^{-t}\cdot {\rm  e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 2t} \hspace{0.05cm} . $$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation_by_magnitude_and_phase|Euler&#039;s theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is obtained for the sum signal:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) =  h_1(t) + h_2(t)\hspace{0.3cm} &lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h(t) = {\rm  e}^{-t}\cdot \big [ (1 - {\rm j}\cdot 0.75)\cdot (\cos() + {\rm j}\cdot \sin())+&lt;br /&gt;
 + (1 + {\rm j}\cdot 0.75)\cdot (\cos() - {\rm j}\cdot \sin())\big ]$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h(t) ={\rm  e}^{-t}\cdot \big [ 2\cdot \cos(2t) + 1.5 \cdot \sin(2t)\big ]\hspace{0.05cm} . $$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the attenuated-oscillatory impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; attenuated by &amp;amp;nbsp;${\rm e}^{–t}$&amp;amp;nbsp; for this pole–zero configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Critically-damped case==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
With &amp;amp;nbsp;$R = 50 \ \rm Ω$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$L = 25 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; H$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 40 \ \rm nF$&amp;amp;nbsp; we get the so-called &amp;quot;critically-damped case&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)= K \cdot \frac {p - p_{\rm o }} {(p - p_{\rm x })^2}= 2 \cdot \frac {p + 0.5 } {(p +1)^2}  \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The capacitance value &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 40 \ \rm nF$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the smallest possible value for which there are just real pole places.&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These coincide, that is &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = \ -1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a double pole place.&amp;amp;nbsp; The time function is thus according to the residue theorem with &amp;amp;nbsp;$l = 2$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) = {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x} } } \hspace{-0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= \frac{ {\rm d} }{ {\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{ {\rm x} })^2\cdot {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x} } } = K \cdot \frac{ {\rm d} }{ {\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}\left \{ (p - p_{ {\rm o} })\cdot {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}  \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x} } } \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_T_3_3_S3c.png |right|frame| Impulse response and step response of the critically-damped case]]&lt;br /&gt;
Using the&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;product rule&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; of differential calculus, this gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) = K \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} + (p - p_{ {\rm o} })\cdot t \cdot {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \right ] \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-1} = {\rm  e}^{-t}\cdot \left ( 2 - t \right)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows this impulse response (green curve) in normalized representation.&amp;amp;nbsp; It differs only slightly from the one with the two different poles at&amp;amp;nbsp; $-0.4$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $-1.6$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signal drawn in red &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t) = 1 - {\rm e}^{-t} + t \cdot {\rm e}^{-t}$&amp;amp;nbsp; results when a step function is also considered at the input &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;step response&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To calculate the step response &amp;amp;nbsp;$\sigma(t) = y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; one can alternatively &lt;br /&gt;
*consider an additional pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$ &amp;amp;nbsp; in the residual calculation (marked in red), or &lt;br /&gt;
*form the integral over the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Partial fraction decomposition==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Prerequisite for the application of the residue theorem is that there are less zeros than poles &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; $Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; must always be smaller than &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If,&amp;amp;nbsp; on the other hand,&amp;amp;nbsp; as in the case of a high-pass filter &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$,&amp;amp;nbsp; then &lt;br /&gt;
*is the limit of the spectral function&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for large &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;nbsp; not equal to zero, &lt;br /&gt;
*if the associated time signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; also contains a &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Signal_Representation/Direct_Current_Signal_-_Limit_Case_of_a_Periodic_Signal#Dirac_.28delta.29_function_in_frequency_domain|Dirac delta functions]],  &lt;br /&gt;
*the residue theorem fails and a&amp;amp;nbsp; [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fraction_decomposition &#039;&#039;&#039;Partial fraction decomposition&#039;&#039;&#039;]&amp;amp;nbsp; must be performed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure is to be clarified exemplarily for a high pass of first order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1775__LZI_T_3_3_S5_neu.png |right|frame| Impulse response of low-pass (blue) and high-pass (red)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{GraueBox|TEXT=  &lt;br /&gt;
$\text{Example 1:}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
The&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$-transfer function of a&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;first-order RC high-pass filter&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; can be transformed by splitting off a constant as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\frac{p}{p + RC} = 1- \frac{RC}{p + RC}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the high-pass impulse response is:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h_{\rm HP}(t) = \delta(t) - h_{\rm TP}(t) \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows &lt;br /&gt;
*as a red curve the high pass&amp;amp;ndash;impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h_{\rm HP}(t)$,&lt;br /&gt;
*as a blue curve the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h_{\rm TP}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the equivalent low pass. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dirac delta function is the Laplace transform of the constant value&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;while the second function to be subtracted gives the impulse response of the equivalent low-pass filter, which is given by  the residue theorem with &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z = 0,\hspace{0.2cm} N =1,\hspace{0.2cm} K = RC.$$ }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exercises for the chapter==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.5:_Circuit_with_R,_L_and_C|Exercise 3.5: Circuit with R, L and C]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.5Z:_Application_of_the_Residue_Theorem|Exercise 3.5Z: Application of the Residue Theorem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior|Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles|Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter|Exercise 3.7: Impulse Response of a High-Pass Filter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition|Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Display}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behaviour&amp;diff=42459</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behaviour</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behaviour&amp;diff=42459"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:03:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: Oezer moved page Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behaviour to Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42458</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42458"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:03:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: Oezer moved page Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behaviour to Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ &amp;amp;nbsp; at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42457</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42457"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T08:02:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace tansform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
is considered, in particular the limiting case for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The frequency variable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is normalized such that time&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; is in microseconds after applying the residue theorem. &lt;br /&gt;
*A result &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus to be interpreted as &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; with &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; is as follows using the example of the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with two simple poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The amplitude ofn&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of $x(t)$ is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is cosine-shaped.&lt;br /&gt;
- For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is sinusoidal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The limiting case &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1, 3 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained for signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for positive times by applying the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 2 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*In principle, this subtask could be solved in the same way as subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, the integration theorem can also be used. &lt;br /&gt;
*This says among other things that multiplication by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the spectral domain corresponds to integration in the time domain:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; The causal cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and the causal sine signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sind auf dem Angabenblatt zu&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:3.6_Einschwingverhalten|Exercise 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bzw.&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; dargestellt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Vergleich mit der Berechnung von &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der Grenzübergang für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt damit zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Zum gleichen Ergebnis kommt man durch die Betrachtung im Spektralbereich:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42456</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42456"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T07:54:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace tansform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
is considered, in particular the limiting case for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The frequency variable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is normalized such that time&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; is in microseconds after applying the residue theorem. &lt;br /&gt;
*A result &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus to be interpreted as &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; with &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; is as follows using the example of the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with two simple poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The amplitude ofn&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of $x(t)$ is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is cosine-shaped.&lt;br /&gt;
- For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is sinusoidal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The limiting case &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;suggested solutions 1, 3 and 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained for signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for positive times by applying the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Prinzipiell könnte diese Teilaufgabe in gleicher Weise gelöst werden wie die Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*Man kann aber auch den Integrationssatz heranziehen. &lt;br /&gt;
*Dieser besagt unter anderem, dass die Multiplikation mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; im Spektralbereich der Integration im Zeitbereich entspricht:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweis&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; Das kausale Cosinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sowie das kausale Sinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sind auf dem Angabenblatt zu&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:3.6_Einschwingverhalten|Aufgabe 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bzw.&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; dargestellt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Vergleich mit der Berechnung von &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der Grenzübergang für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt damit zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Zum gleichen Ergebnis kommt man durch die Betrachtung im Spektralbereich:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42455</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42455"/>
		<updated>2021-10-25T00:21:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace tansform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
is considered, in particular the limiting case for &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The frequency variable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is normalized such that time&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; is in microseconds after applying the residue theorem. &lt;br /&gt;
*A result &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus to be interpreted as &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; with &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; is as follows using the example of the function &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with two simple poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The amplitude ofn&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of $x(t)$ is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Which of the following statements are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal cosine signal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a causal sinusoidal signal.&lt;br /&gt;
- The amplitude of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The period of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is cosine-shaped.&lt;br /&gt;
- For &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is sinusoidal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The limiting case &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; results in the step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1, 3 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Durch Anwendung des Residuensatzes erhält man für das Signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bei positiven Zeiten:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Prinzipiell könnte diese Teilaufgabe in gleicher Weise gelöst werden wie die Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*Man kann aber auch den Integrationssatz heranziehen. &lt;br /&gt;
*Dieser besagt unter anderem, dass die Multiplikation mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; im Spektralbereich der Integration im Zeitbereich entspricht:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweis&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; Das kausale Cosinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sowie das kausale Sinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sind auf dem Angabenblatt zu&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:3.6_Einschwingverhalten|Aufgabe 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bzw.&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; dargestellt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Vergleich mit der Berechnung von &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der Grenzübergang für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt damit zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Zum gleichen Ergebnis kommt man durch die Betrachtung im Spektralbereich:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42418</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42418"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:45:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Two imaginary poles and one zero ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with the Laplace transform&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
corresponding to the graph&amp;amp;nbsp; (one red zero and two green poles). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the Laplace spectral function&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the red zero does not belong to &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abschließend wird noch das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit der Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Transformierten&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
betrachtet, insbesondere der Grenzfall für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Frequenzvariable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist so normiert, dass nach Anwendung des Residuensatzes die Zeit&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; in Mikrosekunden angegeben ist. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Ergebnis &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist somit als &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp; zu interpretieren. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; lautet am Beispiel der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit zwei einfachen Polstellen bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Welche der folgenden Aussagen sind richtig?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Cosinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Sinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Amplitude von&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Periodendauer von $x(t)$ ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Welche der folgenden Aussagen sind richtig?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Cosinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Sinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
- Die Amplitude von&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Periodendauer von&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Welche Aussagen treffen für das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Für &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; verläuft &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; cosinusförmig.&lt;br /&gt;
- Für &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; verläuft &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sinusförmig.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Der Grenzfall &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1, 3 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Durch Anwendung des Residuensatzes erhält man für das Signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bei positiven Zeiten:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Prinzipiell könnte diese Teilaufgabe in gleicher Weise gelöst werden wie die Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*Man kann aber auch den Integrationssatz heranziehen. &lt;br /&gt;
*Dieser besagt unter anderem, dass die Multiplikation mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; im Spektralbereich der Integration im Zeitbereich entspricht:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweis&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; Das kausale Cosinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sowie das kausale Sinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sind auf dem Angabenblatt zu&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:3.6_Einschwingverhalten|Aufgabe 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bzw.&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; dargestellt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Vergleich mit der Berechnung von &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der Grenzübergang für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt damit zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Zum gleichen Ergebnis kommt man durch die Betrachtung im Spektralbereich:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&amp;diff=42414</id>
		<title>Linear and Time Invariant Systems/Inverse Laplace Transform</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&amp;diff=42414"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:34:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
{{Header&lt;br /&gt;
|Untermenü=Beschreibung kausaler realisierbarer Systeme&lt;br /&gt;
|Vorherige Seite=Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function&lt;br /&gt;
|Nächste Seite=Some_Results_from_Transmission_Line_Theory&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Problem formulation and prerequisites==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{BlaueBox|TEXT=  &lt;br /&gt;
$\text{Task:}$&amp;amp;nbsp; This chapter deals with the following problem: &lt;br /&gt;
*The&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$–spectral function&amp;amp;nbsp; $Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;  is given in&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;pole-zero&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; notation. &lt;br /&gt;
*The&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;inverse Laplace transform&#039;&#039;&#039;, i.e. the associated time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is searched-for,&amp;amp;nbsp; where the following notation should hold:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y(t) = {\rm L}^{-1}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\}\hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm briefly}\hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 y(t) \quad \circ\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\bullet\quad Y_{\rm L}(p)\hspace{0.05cm} .$$}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_T_3_3_S1.png |right|frame|Prerequisites for the chapter &amp;quot;Inverse Laplace Transform&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The graph summarizes the prerequisites for this task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; describes the transfer function of the causal system and &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; specifies the Laplace transform of the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; considering the input signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is characterized by &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; poles,&amp;amp;nbsp; by &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z ≤ N$&amp;amp;nbsp; zeros and by the constant &amp;amp;nbsp;$K.$ &lt;br /&gt;
*Poles and zeros exhibit the properties mentioned in the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function#Properties_of_poles_and_zeros|last chapter]]:&amp;amp;nbsp; Poles are only allowed in the left &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$–half plane or on the imaginary axis;&amp;amp;nbsp; zeros are also allowed in the right &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$–half plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*All singularities – this is the generic term for poles and zeros – are either real or exist as pairs of conjugate-complex singularities.&amp;amp;nbsp; Multiple poles and zeros are also allowed. &lt;br /&gt;
*With the input &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t) = δ(t)$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp;  $X_{\rm L}(p) = 1$  &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp;  $Y_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}(p)$, the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; then describes the [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/System_Description_in_Time_Domain#Impulse_response|impulse response]]  &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the transmission system.&amp;amp;nbsp; For this purpose, only the singularities drawn in green in the graph may be used for computation. &lt;br /&gt;
*A step function &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t) = γ(t)$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp;  $ X_{\rm L} = 1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the input causes the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; to be equal to the &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/System_Description_in_Time_Domain#Step_response|step response]] &amp;amp;nbsp; $σ(t)$ of $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&amp;amp;nbsp; In addition to the singularities of &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; the pole (shown in red in the graph) at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; must now also be taken into account for computation. &lt;br /&gt;
*Only signals for which &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{ \rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be expressed in pole-zero notation are possible as input &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (see the &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function#Some_important_Laplace_correspondences|table]]&amp;amp;nbsp; in the chapter &amp;quot;Laplace Transform and $p$–Transfer Function&amp;quot;), for example a cosine or sine signal switched on at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*So, a rectangle as input signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)\ \  ⇒ \ \ X_{\rm L}(p) = (1 - {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} T})/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; is not possible in the approach described here.&amp;amp;nbsp; However, the rectangular response &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be computed indirectly as the difference of two step responses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Some results of the theory of functions==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_and_Its_Inverse#The_first_Fourier_integral|Fourier integrals]],&amp;amp;nbsp; which differ only slightly in the two directions of transformation,&amp;amp;nbsp; for&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Laplace&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; the computation of &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; from &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$ – that is the inverse transformation – is&lt;br /&gt;
*much more difficult than computing &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; from &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$, &lt;br /&gt;
*unresolvable or solvable only very laboriously by elementary means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{BlaueBox|TEXT=  &lt;br /&gt;
$\text{Definition:}$&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
In general, the following holds for the&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;inverse Laplace trans&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y(t) = {\rm L}^{-1}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\}= \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm}\rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm}\infty}  \hspace{0.15cm} \frac{1}{ {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi}\cdot     \int_{ \alpha - {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2 \pi \beta } ^{\alpha+{\rm j}  \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2 \pi \beta}  Y_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 d}p \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The integration is parallel to the imaginary axis. &lt;br /&gt;
*The real part &amp;amp;nbsp;$α$&amp;amp;nbsp; is to be chosen such that all poles are located to the left of the integration path.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_T_3_3_S2.png |right|frame|Line integral together with left and right circular integral]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The left graph illustrates this line integral along the red dotted vertical &amp;amp;nbsp;${\rm Re}\{p\}= α$.&amp;amp;nbsp; This integral is solvable using &amp;amp;nbsp;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan%27s_lemma Jordan&#039;s lemma of complex analysis].&amp;amp;nbsp; In this tutorial only a very short and simple summary of the approach is depicted: &lt;br /&gt;
*The line integral can be divided into two circular integrals so that all poles are located in the left circular integral while the right circular integral may only contain zeros. &lt;br /&gt;
*According to the theory of functions, the right circular integral yields the time function &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for negative times.&amp;amp;nbsp; Due to causality, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t &amp;lt; 0)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero,&amp;amp;nbsp; but according to the fundamental theorem of the theory of functions this is only true if there are no poles in the right &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$–half-plane. &lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast,&amp;amp;nbsp; the integral over the left semicircle yields the time function for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t ≥ 0$.&amp;amp;nbsp; This encloses all poles and can be computed using the&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;residue theorem&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; in a (relatively) simple way,&amp;amp;nbsp; as it will be shown on the next pages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formulation of the residue theorem==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is further assumed that the transfer function &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be expressed in pole-zero notation  by &lt;br /&gt;
*the constant factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $K$, &lt;br /&gt;
*the &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;zeros&amp;quot; &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm o}i}$&amp;amp;nbsp; $(i = 1$, ... , $Z)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &lt;br /&gt;
*the &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;poles&amp;quot; &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}i}$&amp;amp;nbsp; $(i = 1$, ... , $N$). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also assume &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z &amp;lt; N$. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of distinguishable poles is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$I$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Multiple poles are counted only once to determine &amp;amp;nbsp;$I$.&amp;amp;nbsp; Thus, the following holds for the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Some_results_of_the_theory_of_functions|sketch]]&amp;amp;nbsp; in the last section considering the  double pole: &amp;amp;nbsp;  $N = 5$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$I = 4$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{BlaueBox|TEXT=  &lt;br /&gt;
$\text{Residue Theorem:}$&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
Considering the above conditions, the&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;inverse Laplace transform&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; of &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t ≥ 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; is obtained as the sum of&amp;amp;nbsp; $I$&amp;amp;nbsp; natural oscillations of the poles,&amp;amp;nbsp; which are called the&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;residuals&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; – abbreviated as &amp;quot;Res&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{I}{\rm Res} \bigg \vert _{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}_i}} \hspace{-0.7cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t}\} \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since&amp;amp;nbsp; $Y_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is only specifiable for causal signals, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t &amp;lt; 0) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; always holds for negative times. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In general,&amp;amp;nbsp; the following holds for a pole of multiplicity &amp;amp;nbsp;$l$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg \vert _{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x}_i} } \hspace{-0.7cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= \frac{1}{(l-1)!}\cdot \frac{ {\rm d}^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1} }{ {\rm d}p^{\hspace{0.05cm}l-1} }\hspace{0.15cm} \left \{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{ {\rm x}_i})^{\hspace{0.05cm}l}\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\} \bigg \vert_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x}_i} } \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The following is obtained out of it with &amp;amp;nbsp;$l = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; for a simple pole as a special case:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm Res} \bigg\vert_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x}_i} } \hspace{-0.7cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{ {\rm x}_i} )\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg \vert _{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x}_i} } \hspace{0.05cm} .$$}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the next pages,&amp;amp;nbsp; the&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;residue theorem&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; is illustrated by three detailed examples corresponding to the three constellations in&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function#Properties_of_poles_and_zeros| $\text{Example 3}$]]&amp;amp;nbsp; in the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Laplace Transform and p-Transfer Function&amp;quot;: &lt;br /&gt;
*So, we consider again the two-port network with an inductance &amp;amp;nbsp;$L = 25 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro;H$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the longitudinal branch as well as the the series connection of an ohmic resistance&amp;amp;nbsp; $R = 50 \ \rm Ω$&amp;amp;nbsp; and a capacitance&amp;amp;nbsp; $C$&amp;amp;nbsp; in the transverse branch. &lt;br /&gt;
*For the latter,&amp;amp;nbsp; we again consider three different values,&amp;amp;nbsp; namely &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 62.5 \ \rm nF$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 8 \ \rm nF$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 40 \ \rm nF$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The following is always assumed: &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t) = δ(t) \; ⇒  \; X_{\rm L}(p) = 1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; $Y_{\rm L}(p) = H_{\rm L}(p)$  &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; the output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aperiodically decaying impulse response==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The following is obtained for the&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;ndash;transfer function computed on the page &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace_Transform_and_p-Transfer_Function#Pole-zero_representation_of_circuits|pole-zero representation of circuits]]&amp;amp;nbsp; with the capacitance &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 62.5 \ \rm nF$&amp;amp;nbsp; and the other numerical values given in the graph below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: EN_LZI_T_3_3_S3a.png|right|frame|Aperiodically decaying impulse response]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)= K \cdot \frac {p - p_{\rm o }} {(p - p_{\rm x 1})(p - p_{\rm x 2})}= 2 \cdot \frac {p + 0.32 }&lt;br /&gt;
 {(p +0.4)(p +1.6 )} \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note the normalization of &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$K$ and also of all poles and zeros by the factor &amp;amp;nbsp;${\rm 10^6} · 1/\rm s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The impulse response is composed of &amp;amp;nbsp;$I = N = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; natural oscillations. For $t &amp;lt; 0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; these are equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
*The residual of the pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}1} =\  –0.4$&amp;amp;nbsp; yields the following time function:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h_1(t)  =  {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}} \hspace{-0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{{\rm x}1})\cdot {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
: $$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_1(t)  =  2 \cdot \frac {p + 0.32 } {p +0.4}\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}= - \frac {2 } {15}\cdot  {\rm e}^{-0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} t} \hspace{0.05cm}. $$&lt;br /&gt;
*In the same way, the residual of the second pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}2} = \ –1.6$&amp;amp;nbsp; can be computed:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h_2(t)  =  {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}} \hspace{-0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{{\rm x}2})\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_2(t)  =  2 \cdot \frac {p + 0.32 } {p +1.6}\cdot  {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-1.6}=  \frac {32 } {15}\cdot  {\rm e}^{-1.6 \hspace{0.05cm} t} \hspace{0.05cm}. $$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows &amp;amp;nbsp;$h_1(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$h_2(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; as well as the sum signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*The normalization factor &amp;amp;nbsp;$1/T = 10^6 · \rm 1/s$ is taken into account here so that the time is normalized to &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*For &amp;amp;nbsp;$t =0$,&amp;amp;nbsp; $T \cdot h(t=0) =  {32 }/ {15} -{2 }/ {15}= 2 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp; is obtained as a result. &lt;br /&gt;
*For times &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; 2 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$,&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response is negative&amp;amp;nbsp; (although only slightly and difficult to see in the graph).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Attenuated-oscillatory impulse response==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The component values &amp;amp;nbsp;$R = 50 \ \rm Ω$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$L = 25 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; H$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 8 \ \rm nF$ result in two conjugate complex poles at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}1} = \ –1 + {\rm j} · 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{{\rm x}2} = \ –1 - {\rm j} · 2$.&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_T_3_3_S3b.png|right|frame| Attenuated-oscillatory impulse response]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The zero is located at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm o} = \ –2.5$. &lt;br /&gt;
*$K = 2$&amp;amp;nbsp; holds and all numerical values are to be multiplied again by the factor &amp;amp;nbsp;$1/T$&amp;amp;nbsp; $(T = 1\ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When applying the residue theorem to this configuration the following is obtained:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h_1(t) =   K \cdot \frac {p_{\rm x 1} - p_{\rm o }} {p_{\rm x 1} - p_{\rm x 2}} \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 1} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t} $$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_1(t) =    2 \cdot \frac {-1 + {\rm j}\cdot 2 +2.5} {(-1 + {\rm j}\cdot 2) - (-1 - {\rm j}\cdot 2)}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 1}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_1(t) =  2 \cdot \frac {1.5 + {\rm j}\cdot 2} {{\rm j}\cdot 4}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 1} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}= (1 - {\rm j}\cdot 0.75)\cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 e}^{-t}\cdot {\rm  e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 2t} \hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ h_2(t) =   K \cdot \frac {p_{\rm x 2} - p_{\rm o }} {p_{\rm x 2} - p_{\rm x 1}}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 2} \hspace{0.03cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t} $$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} h_2(t) =  2 \cdot \frac {-1 - {\rm j}\cdot 2 +2.5} {(-1 - {\rm j}\cdot 2) - (-1 + {\rm j}\cdot 2)}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 2} \hspace{0.03cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t} $$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h_2(t) =2 \cdot \frac {1.5 - {\rm j}\cdot 2} {-{\rm j}\cdot 4}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{\rm x 2} \hspace{0.03cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}= (1 + {\rm j}\cdot 0.75)\cdot {\rm e}^{-t}\cdot {\rm  e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 2t} \hspace{0.05cm} . $$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation_by_magnitude_and_phase|Euler&#039;s theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is obtained for the sum signal:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) =  h_1(t) + h_2(t)\hspace{0.3cm} &lt;br /&gt;
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h(t) = {\rm  e}^{-t}\cdot \big [ (1 - {\rm j}\cdot 0.75)\cdot (\cos() + {\rm j}\cdot \sin())+&lt;br /&gt;
 + (1 + {\rm j}\cdot 0.75)\cdot (\cos() - {\rm j}\cdot \sin())\big ]$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}h(t) ={\rm  e}^{-t}\cdot \big [ 2\cdot \cos(2t) + 1.5 \cdot \sin(2t)\big ]\hspace{0.05cm} . $$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the attenuated-oscillatory impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; attenuated by &amp;amp;nbsp;${\rm e}^{–t}$&amp;amp;nbsp; for this pole–zero configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Critically-damped case==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
With &amp;amp;nbsp;$R = 50 \ \rm Ω$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$L = 25 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; H$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 40 \ \rm nF$&amp;amp;nbsp; we get the so-called &amp;quot;critically-damped case&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p)= K \cdot \frac {p - p_{\rm o }} {(p - p_{\rm x })^2}= 2 \cdot \frac {p + 0.5 } {(p +1)^2}  \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The capacitance value &amp;amp;nbsp;$C = 40 \ \rm nF$&amp;amp;nbsp; is the smallest possible value for which there are just real pole places.&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These coincide, that is &amp;amp;nbsp;$p_{\rm x} = \ -1$&amp;amp;nbsp; is a double pole place.&amp;amp;nbsp; The time function is thus according to the residue theorem with &amp;amp;nbsp;$l = 2$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) = {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x} } } \hspace{-0.7cm}\{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{p t}\}= \frac{ {\rm d} }{ {\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 \left \{H_{\rm L}(p)\cdot (p - p_{ {\rm x} })^2\cdot {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x} } } = K \cdot \frac{ {\rm d} }{ {\rm d}p}\hspace{0.15cm}\left \{ (p - p_{ {\rm o} })\cdot {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t}\right\}  \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{ {\rm x} } } \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EN_LZI_T_3_3_S3c.png |right|frame| Impulse response and step response of the critically-damped case]]&lt;br /&gt;
Using the&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;product rule&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; of differential calculus, this gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h(t) = K \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} + (p - p_{ {\rm o} })\cdot t \cdot {\rm e}^{p \hspace{0.05cm}t} \right ] \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}-1} = {\rm  e}^{-t}\cdot \left ( 2 - t \right)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows this impulse response (green curve) in normalized representation.&amp;amp;nbsp; It differs only slightly from the one with the two different poles at&amp;amp;nbsp; $-0.4$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $-1.6$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signal drawn in red &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t) = 1 - {\rm e}^{-t} + t \cdot {\rm e}^{-t}$&amp;amp;nbsp; results when a step function is also considered at the input &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;step response&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To calculate the step response &amp;amp;nbsp;$\sigma(t) = y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; one can alternatively &lt;br /&gt;
*consider an additional pole at &amp;amp;nbsp;$p = 0$ &amp;amp;nbsp; in the residual calculation (marked in red), or &lt;br /&gt;
*form the integral over the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Partial fraction decomposition==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Prerequisite for the application of the residue theorem is that there are less zeros than poles &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;rArr; &amp;amp;nbsp; $Z$&amp;amp;nbsp; must always be smaller than &amp;amp;nbsp;$N$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If,&amp;amp;nbsp; on the other hand,&amp;amp;nbsp; as in the case of a high-pass filter &amp;amp;nbsp;$Z = N$,&amp;amp;nbsp; then &lt;br /&gt;
*is the limit of the spectral function&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for large &amp;amp;nbsp;$p$&amp;amp;nbsp; not equal to zero, &lt;br /&gt;
*if the associated time signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; also contains a &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Signal_Representation/Direct_Current_Signal_-_Limit_Case_of_a_Periodic_Signal#Dirac_.28delta.29_function_in_frequency_domain|Dirac delta functions]],  &lt;br /&gt;
*the residue theorem fails and a&amp;amp;nbsp; [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fraction_decomposition &#039;&#039;&#039;Partial fraction decomposition&#039;&#039;&#039;]&amp;amp;nbsp; must be performed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure is to be clarified exemplarily for a high pass of first order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1775__LZI_T_3_3_S5_neu.png |right|frame| Impulse response of low-pass (blue) and high-pass (red)]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{GraueBox|TEXT=  &lt;br /&gt;
$\text{Example 1:}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
The&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$-transfer function of a&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;first-order RC high-pass filter&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp; can be transformed by splitting off a constant as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\frac{p}{p + RC} = 1- \frac{RC}{p + RC}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the high-pass impulse response is:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$h_{\rm HP}(t) = \delta(t) - h_{\rm TP}(t) \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows &lt;br /&gt;
*as a red curve the high pass&amp;amp;ndash;impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h_{\rm HP}(t)$,&lt;br /&gt;
*as a blue curve the impulse response &amp;amp;nbsp;$h_{\rm TP}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the equivalent low pass. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dirac delta function is the Laplace transform of the constant value&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;while the second function to be subtracted gives the impulse response of the equivalent low-pass filter, which is given by  the residue theorem with &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z = 0,\hspace{0.2cm} N =1,\hspace{0.2cm} K = RC.$$ }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exercises for the chapter==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.5:_Circuit_with_R,_L_and_C|Exercise 3.5: Circuit with R, L and C]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.5Z:_Application_of_the_Residue_Theorem|Exercise 3.5Z: Application of the Residue Theorem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behaviour|Exercise 3.6: Transient Behaviour]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles|Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7:_Impulse_Response_of_a_High-Pass_Filter|Exercise 3.7: Impulse Response of a High-Pass Filter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.7Z:_Partial_Fraction_Decomposition|Exercise 3.7Z: Partial Fraction Decomposition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Display}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42413</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42413"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:32:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Zwei imaginäre Polstellen und eine Nullstelle ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In dieser Aufgabe betrachten wir ein kausales Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit der Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Transformierten&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
entsprechend der Grafik&amp;amp;nbsp; (eine rote Nullstelle und zwei grüne Pole). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitze dagegen die Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Spektralfunktion&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Die rote Nullstelle gehört somit nicht zu &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abschließend wird noch das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit der Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Transformierten&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
betrachtet, insbesondere der Grenzfall für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Frequenzvariable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist so normiert, dass nach Anwendung des Residuensatzes die Zeit&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; in Mikrosekunden angegeben ist. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Ergebnis &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist somit als &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp; zu interpretieren. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; lautet am Beispiel der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit zwei einfachen Polstellen bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Welche der folgenden Aussagen sind richtig?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Cosinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Sinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Amplitude von&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Periodendauer von $x(t)$ ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Welche der folgenden Aussagen sind richtig?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Cosinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Sinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
- Die Amplitude von&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Periodendauer von&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Welche Aussagen treffen für das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Für &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; verläuft &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; cosinusförmig.&lt;br /&gt;
- Für &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; verläuft &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sinusförmig.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Der Grenzfall &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1, 3 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Durch Anwendung des Residuensatzes erhält man für das Signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bei positiven Zeiten:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Prinzipiell könnte diese Teilaufgabe in gleicher Weise gelöst werden wie die Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*Man kann aber auch den Integrationssatz heranziehen. &lt;br /&gt;
*Dieser besagt unter anderem, dass die Multiplikation mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; im Spektralbereich der Integration im Zeitbereich entspricht:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweis&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; Das kausale Cosinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sowie das kausale Sinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sind auf dem Angabenblatt zu&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:3.6_Einschwingverhalten|Aufgabe 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bzw.&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; dargestellt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Vergleich mit der Berechnung von &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der Grenzübergang für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt damit zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Zum gleichen Ergebnis kommt man durch die Betrachtung im Spektralbereich:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42412</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6Z: Two Imaginary Poles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6Z:_Two_Imaginary_Poles&amp;diff=42412"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:27:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1786__LZI_Z_3_6.png|right|frame|Zwei imaginäre Polstellen und eine Nullstelle ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In dieser Aufgabe betrachten wir ein kausales Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit der Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Transformierten&lt;br /&gt;
:$$X_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)(p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
entsprechend der Grafik&amp;amp;nbsp; (eine rote Nullstelle und zwei grüne Pole). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; besitze dagegen die Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Spektralfunktion&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { 1} { p^2 + 4 \pi^2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Die rote Nullstelle gehört somit nicht zu &amp;amp;nbsp;$Y_{\rm L}(p)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abschließend wird noch das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit der Laplace&amp;amp;ndash;Transformierten&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac { p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot \beta)(p+{\rm j} \cdot \beta)}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$$&lt;br /&gt;
betrachtet, insbesondere der Grenzfall für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Die Frequenzvariable&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist so normiert, dass nach Anwendung des Residuensatzes die Zeit&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; in Mikrosekunden angegeben ist. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Ergebnis &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 1$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist somit als &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit &amp;amp;nbsp;$T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$&amp;amp;nbsp; zu interpretieren. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der &amp;amp;nbsp;[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Laplace–Rücktransformation#Formulierung_des_Residuensatzes|Residuensatz]]&amp;amp;nbsp; lautet am Beispiel der Funktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$X_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; mit zwei einfachen Polstellen bei &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \pm {\rm j} \cdot \beta$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x(t)  =  X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p - {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p\hspace{0.05cm} \cdot &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}+X_{\rm L}(p) \cdot (p + {\rm j} \cdot \beta) \cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}t}  \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.1cm} p\hspace{0.05cm}=\hspace{0.05cm}{-\rm j \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \it&lt;br /&gt;
 \beta}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fragebogen===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$. Welche der folgenden Aussagen sind richtig?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Cosinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
- $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Sinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Amplitude von&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Periodendauer von $x(t)$ ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Berechnen Sie das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y(t)$. Welche der folgenden Aussagen sind richtig?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
- $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Cosinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
+ $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist ein kausales Sinussignal.&lt;br /&gt;
- Die Amplitude von&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Die Periodendauer von&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist&amp;amp;nbsp; $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Welche Aussagen treffen für das Signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zu?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ Für &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; verläuft &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; cosinusförmig.&lt;br /&gt;
- Für &amp;amp;nbsp;$ \beta &amp;gt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; verläuft &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sinusförmig.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Der Grenzfall &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Musterlösung===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1, 3 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Durch Anwendung des Residuensatzes erhält man für das Signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bei positiven Zeiten:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$x_1(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}\hspace{0.05cm} ,$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$ x_2(t)\hspace{0.25cm} =  \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.7cm}\{X_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { p-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= -{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac{1}{2} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}+{\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 t}\right ] = \cos(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 2 und 4&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Prinzipiell könnte diese Teilaufgabe in gleicher Weise gelöst werden wie die Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
*Man kann aber auch den Integrationssatz heranziehen. &lt;br /&gt;
*Dieser besagt unter anderem, dass die Multiplikation mit&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/p$&amp;amp;nbsp; im Spektralbereich der Integration im Zeitbereich entspricht:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) = {1}/{p} \cdot X_{\rm L}(p) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} t \ge 0:\quad y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t \cos(2\pi&lt;br /&gt;
 \tau)\,\,{\rm d}\tau = {1}/({2\pi}) \cdot \sin(2\pi t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Hinweis&#039;&#039;: &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; Das kausale Cosinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sowie das kausale Sinussignal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; sind auf dem Angabenblatt zu&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Aufgaben:3.6_Einschwingverhalten|Aufgabe 3.6]]&amp;amp;nbsp; als&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; bzw.&amp;amp;nbsp; $s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; dargestellt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Richtig sind &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;die Lösungsvorschläge 1 und 3&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Ein Vergleich mit der Berechnung von &amp;amp;nbsp;$x(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; zeigt, dass &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = \cos (\beta \cdot t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t \ge 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; und &amp;amp;nbsp;$z(t) = 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; für &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; gilt. &lt;br /&gt;
*Der Grenzübergang für &amp;amp;nbsp;$\beta &amp;amp;#8594; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; führt damit zur Sprungfunktion &amp;amp;nbsp;$\gamma(t)$. &lt;br /&gt;
*Zum gleichen Ergebnis kommt man durch die Betrachtung im Spektralbereich:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Z_{\rm L}(p) = \lim_{\beta \hspace{0.05cm} \rightarrow \hspace{0.05cm} 0}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{p}{p^2 + \beta^2} = {1}/{p}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}&lt;br /&gt;
  z(t) = \gamma(t)&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42411</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42411"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:24:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ &amp;amp;nbsp; at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42410</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42410"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:21:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42409</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42409"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:20:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42408</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42408"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:18:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42407</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42407"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T14:16:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42403</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42403"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T13:56:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42401</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42401"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T13:51:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm deg$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42400</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42400"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T13:49:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42399</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42399"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T13:48:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42398</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42398"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T13:46:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the below diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase.&amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42397</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42397"/>
		<updated>2021-10-24T13:42:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{for}}  \\ {\rm{for}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the diagram below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase.&amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42381</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42381"/>
		<updated>2021-10-23T21:50:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{f\ddot{u}r}}  \\ {\rm{f\ddot{u}r}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the diagram below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase.&amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Finally, the following is obtained for the last residual:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, the output signal is as follows for a causal cosine signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:For comparison: &amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has the value&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$ at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contrast to this, the following arises as a result in general and specifically at the time of the first maximum at&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$ for the causal sinusoidal signal applied to the input:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42380</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42380"/>
		<updated>2021-10-23T21:42:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{f\ddot{u}r}}  \\ {\rm{f\ddot{u}r}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the diagram below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase.&amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using Euler&#039;s theorem this can also be expressed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is equal to the signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; computed in subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Schließlich erhält man für das letzte Residuum:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Damit lautet das Ausgangssignal bei kausalem Cosinussignal am Eingang:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:Zum Vergleich: &amp;amp;nbsp; Das Signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; hat zu diesem Zeitpunkt den Wert&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dagegen ergibt sich beim kausalen Sinussignal am Eingang allgemein und speziell zum Zeitpunkt des ersten Maximums bei&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42379</id>
		<title>Aufgaben:Exercise 3.6: Transient Behavior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.lntwww.lnt.ei.tum.de/index.php?title=Aufgaben:Exercise_3.6:_Transient_Behavior&amp;diff=42379"/>
		<updated>2021-10-23T21:38:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oezer: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1784__LZI_A_3_6.png|right|frame|Cosine and sine waves,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;each causal]]&lt;br /&gt;
In this exercise, we consider a cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; with amplitude&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$&amp;amp;nbsp; and period $T = 1 \ \rm &amp;amp;micro; s$, which is defined for all times&amp;amp;nbsp; $t$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($in the range&amp;amp;nbsp; $ \pm \infty)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c(t) = \cos(2\pi \cdot {t}/{T})&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; (red curve) starts only at the turn-on instant&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$c_{\rm K}(t)= \left\{ \begin{array}{c} c(t) \\&lt;br /&gt;
 0   \end{array} \right.&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{c}   {\rm{f\ddot{u}r}}  \\ {\rm{f\ddot{u}r}}&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}c}&lt;br /&gt;
{  t \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},}  \\&lt;br /&gt;
{ t &amp;lt; 0\hspace{0.05cm}.}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}$$&lt;br /&gt;
Only the Fourier spectrum can be specified for the bilaterally unbounded signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C(f) =  {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f - f_0) + {1}/{ 2} \cdot \delta (f + f_0)&lt;br /&gt;
 \quad {\rm with} \quad f_0 =  {1}/{ T}= 1\,\,{\rm MHz.}$$&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, for the causal cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the Laplace transform can also be specified:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$C_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {p} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the following holds for the Laplace transform of the causal sine function &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$S_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 \pi/T} { (p-{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)\cdot (p+{\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi/T)}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
The bilaterally unbounded sine function is denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and is shown as a blue&amp;amp;ndash;dotted curve in the diagram below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$,  &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$s_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; are applied to the input of a low-pass filter of first-order with the following transfer function (or impulse response):&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {2 /T} { p + 2 /T} \quad&lt;br /&gt;
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-^{\hspace{-0.25cm}\rm L}\!\!\!-\!\!\circ\quad&lt;br /&gt;
h(t) = {2}/{T} \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
*The corresponding output signals are denoted by &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$, &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*These signals are to be computed and correlated to each other in this exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Please note:&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform|Inverse Laplace Transform]].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The computations for subtask&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; are bulky.&lt;br /&gt;
*For computing the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$,&amp;amp;nbsp; for example the&amp;amp;nbsp; [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Inverse_Laplace_Transform#Formulation_of_the_residue_theorem|residue theorem]]&amp;amp;nbsp; can be used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;quiz display=simple&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the frequency response &amp;amp;nbsp;$H(f)$&amp;amp;nbsp; using &amp;amp;nbsp;$H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; by magnitude and phase.&amp;amp;nbsp; What values are obtained for frequency &amp;amp;nbsp;$ f = f_0 = 1/T  = 1 \ \rm MHz$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$|H(f = f_0)| \ = \ $  { 0.303 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
$a(f = f_0)\hspace{0.2cm} =  \ $ { 1.194 3% } $\ \rm Np$&lt;br /&gt;
${\rm arc} \ H(f = f_0)\ =  \ $ { -74--70 } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
$b(f = f_0)\hspace{0.24cm} = \  $ { 72 3% } $\ \rm Grad$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; at the filter output if the cosine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm C}(t = 0) \ =  \ $ { 0.092 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Compute the output signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm S}(t)$ if the sine signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the filter input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What value is obtained for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0$?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_{\rm S}(t = 0) \ = \ $  { -0.295--0.283 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Determine the length of influence &amp;amp;nbsp;$T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the filter impulse response, that is the time at which &amp;amp;nbsp;$h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; has decayed to &amp;amp;nbsp;$1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Normalization to&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$.&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$T_h/T \ =  \ $  { 2.3 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Which statements are true for the signals &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;[]&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
+ The following holds: &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t) \equiv 0$&amp;amp;nbsp; for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; 0$.&lt;br /&gt;
+ The signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm C}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;gt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
- The causal signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is approximately equal to $y_{\rm S}(t)$ for &amp;amp;nbsp;$t &amp;lt; T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Using the residue theorem compute the signal &amp;amp;nbsp;$y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; after the filter if &amp;amp;nbsp;$c_{\rm K}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is applied to the input.&amp;amp;nbsp; What signal value occurs at time &amp;amp;nbsp;$t = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp;?&lt;br /&gt;
|type=&amp;quot;{}&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
$y_\text{CK}(t = T/5) \ =  \ $  { 0.24 3% }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/quiz&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Solution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Kopf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Replacing the parameter&amp;amp;nbsp; $T$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; $1/f_0$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p$&amp;amp;nbsp; by&amp;amp;nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f$ in&amp;amp;nbsp; $H_{\rm L}(p)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the following is thus obtained for the frequency response in general or for&amp;amp;nbsp; $f_0 = 1 \ \rm MHz$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$H(f) =  \frac {2 /T} { {\rm j} \cdot 2 \pi f + 2 /T}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {f_0} { {\rm j} \cdot \pi f + f_0}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} H(f= f_0) =  \frac {1} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} |H(f= f_0)| =  \frac {1} { \sqrt{1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.303}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}a(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 ln}\,\, |H(f= f_0)|  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 1.194\,\,{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 Np}}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0)= - {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
 arctan}\,(\pi)  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}b(f= f_0)=&lt;br /&gt;
 -{\rm arc}\,H(f= f_0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx +72^\circ} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The output signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is attenuated by the factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau \approx 72/360 \cdot T = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to the input signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, this signal can also be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm C}(t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \cos(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm C}(t=0) =  \frac {1} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.092} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is shown dotted in blue in the left graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(3)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is also smaller by the attenuation factor&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$&amp;amp;nbsp; and delayed by the time period&amp;amp;nbsp; $\tau = T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; compared to&amp;amp;nbsp; $s(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can be described as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm S}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) +  \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= 0.303 \cdot \sin(2\pi \cdot \frac{t-T/5}{T}) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm S}(t=0) =  -\frac {\pi} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx -0.289} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
This signal is sketched dotted in blue in the right graph for sample solution&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(4)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; At&amp;amp;nbsp; $T_h$&amp;amp;nbsp; the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; should have decayed to&amp;amp;nbsp; $1\%$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the maximum value. Thus, the following holds:&lt;br /&gt;
:$${\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.03cm}2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}T_{ h}/T} = 0.01 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} {T_{ h}}/{T} =\frac{1}{2}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm ln}\,\, \frac{1}{0.01} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 2.3}&lt;br /&gt;
  \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}h(t=0) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {2}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}h(t=T_{ h}) =&lt;br /&gt;
 {0.02}/{T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(5)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;statements 1 and 2&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are correct:&lt;br /&gt;
*The causal signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; must be identical to zero for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;lt; 0$&amp;amp;nbsp;. &lt;br /&gt;
*However, since the impulse response&amp;amp;nbsp; $h(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; of the considered filter (nearly) vanishes for&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt; T_h$,&amp;amp;nbsp; it does not matter whether the unbounded cosine signal&amp;amp;nbsp;  $c(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; or the causal signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $c_{\rm K}(t)$ is applied to the input after the transient effect is over. &lt;br /&gt;
*The same is true for the sinusoidal signals: &amp;amp;nbsp; For&amp;amp;nbsp; $t &amp;gt;T_{ h}$,&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)=y_{\rm S}(t)$ holds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P_ID1785__LZI_A_3_6_e.png|center|frame|Transient behavior of a causal cosine and a causal sine signal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shows the output signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for cosine-shaped input on the left and the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; for sinusoidal input on the right. Note the transit time of&amp;amp;nbsp; $T/5$&amp;amp;nbsp; $($corresponding to the phase&amp;amp;nbsp; $72^\circ)$&amp;amp;nbsp; in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;
*For&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are smaller than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ &amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In contrast, for&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm SK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first wave peaks are greater than&amp;amp;nbsp; $1$ to achieve the correct phase position of&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm S}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(6)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
$p_{\rm x1}= {\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}p_{\rm x2}= -{\rm j} \cdot {2\pi}/{T} , \hspace{0.1cm}&lt;br /&gt;
 p_{\rm x3}= -{2}/{T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}$&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
the following can be written for the Laplace transform of the signals&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp;:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$Y_{\rm L}(p) =&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
The time function&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm CK}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; is thus composed of three parts according to the residue theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x2}= -p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; the first part is&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_1(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}2})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}1}}=&lt;br /&gt;
\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}1}} { (p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm x}2})(p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Similarly, the following is obtained for the second part:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_2(t)= {\rm Res} \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}\{Y_{\rm L}(p)\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p t}\}=&lt;br /&gt;
 \frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot p} { (p-p_{{\rm x}1})(p-p_{{\rm x}3})}\cdot  {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \bigg |_{p \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}2}}=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
p_{{\rm x}2}} { (p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm x}1})(p_{{\rm x}2}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3})}\cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}p_{{\rm x}2}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {p_{{\rm x}3}/2} { p_{{\rm x}1}+p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}3}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-p_{{\rm x}1}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Combining both parts and considering the numerical values of&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x1}$&amp;amp;nbsp; and&amp;amp;nbsp; $p_{\rm x3}$,&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)= \frac {1/T} { 2/T + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi \hspace{0.03cm} t/T}+\frac {1/T} { 2/T - {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}= \frac {1/2} { 1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2} { 1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)\hspace{0.25cm} = \frac {1/2 \cdot (1 - {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.03cm}{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}+\frac {1/2 \cdot (1 + {\rm j} \cdot \pi)} { 1 + \pi^2 }&lt;br /&gt;
 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} $$ is obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mit Hilfe des Eulerschen Satzes kann hierfür auch geschrieben werden:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{1\hspace{-0.03cm}+2} (t) =  \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}= y_{\rm C}(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$&lt;br /&gt;
Man erkennt, dass&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{1\hspace{0.03cm}+2}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; gleich dem in der Teilaufgabe&amp;amp;nbsp; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;amp;nbsp; berechneten Signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; ist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Schließlich erhält man für das letzte Residuum:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_3(t)=\frac {-p_{{\rm x}3}^2} { (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
x}1}) (p_{{\rm x}3}-p_{{\rm x}2})} \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}p_{{\rm x}3}\cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t}= \frac {-(2/T)^2 \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { (-2/T-{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T) (-2/T+{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi /T)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T} } { (1+{\rm j} \cdot \pi ) (1-{\rm j} \cdot&lt;br /&gt;
 \pi)} =\frac {- {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { 1+\pi^2} &lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Damit lautet das Ausgangssignal bei kausalem Cosinussignal am Eingang:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm CK}(t) = y_1(t)+y_2(t)+y_3(t) = \frac { \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \pi \cdot \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm}y_{\rm CK}(t = {T}/{5})  = \frac { \cos(72^\circ) + \pi \cdot \sin(72^\circ)-{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.4}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 0.24} &amp;lt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
:Zum Vergleich: &amp;amp;nbsp; Das Signal&amp;amp;nbsp; $y_{\rm C}(t)$&amp;amp;nbsp; hat zu diesem Zeitpunkt den Wert&amp;amp;nbsp; $0.303$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dagegen ergibt sich beim kausalen Sinussignal am Eingang allgemein und speziell zum Zeitpunkt des ersten Maximums bei&amp;amp;nbsp; $t = 0.45 \cdot T$:&lt;br /&gt;
:$$y_{\rm SK}(t) =  \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(2\pi  {t}/{T}) + \sin(2\pi  {t}/{T})+\pi \cdot {\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-2&lt;br /&gt;
 \hspace{0.03cm}t/T}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }}$$&lt;br /&gt;
:$$\Rightarrow  \hspace{0.3cm} y_{\rm SK}(t = 0.45 \cdot T)  = \frac { -\pi \cdot \cos(162^\circ) +  \sin(162^\circ)+\pi \cdot{\rm&lt;br /&gt;
e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}-0.9}} { {1 + \pi^2&lt;br /&gt;
 }} \approx 0.42 &amp;gt; 0.303\hspace{0.05cm} .$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{ML-Fuß}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^3.3 Inverse Laplace Transform^]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oezer</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>