Aufgaben:Exercise 5.2: Error Correlation Function: Difference between revisions

From LNTwww
Hwang (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Hwang (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:




Zwei direkt aufeinanderfolgende Bitfehler werden somit durch den Fehlerabstand  $a = 1$  gekennzeichnet.
Two directly consecutive bit errors are thus characterized by the error distance  $a = 1$. 


Die Tabelle zeigt beispielhafte Werte der Fehlerabstandswahrscheinlichkeiten  ${\rm Pr}(a = k)$  sowie der Fehlerkorrelationsfunktion  $\varphi_e(k)$.  
The table shows exemplary values of the error distance probabilities  ${\rm Pr}(a = k)$  as well as the error correlation function  $\varphi_e(k)$.  
*Einige Angaben fehlen in der Tabelle.  
*Some data are missing in the table.
*Diese Werte sollen aus den gegebenen Werten berechnet werden.
*These values are to be calculated from the given values.




Line 28: Line 28:




''Hinweis:''
''Note:''
* Die Aufgabe behandelt den Lehrstoff des Kapitels  [[Digital_Signal_Transmission/Parameters_of_Digital_Channel_Models|"Parameters of Digital Channel Models"]].
* The exercise covers the subject matter of the chapter  [[Digital_Signal_Transmission/Parameters_of_Digital_Channel_Models|"Parameters of Digital Channel Models"]].
   
   




===Fragebogen===
===Questions===
<quiz display=simple>
<quiz display=simple>
{Welcher Wert ergibt sich für die mittlere Fehlerwahrscheinlichkeit?
{Which value results for the average error probability?
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$p_{\rm M} \ = \ ${ 0.1 3% }
$p_{\rm M} \ = \ ${ 0.1 3% }


{Welcher Wert ergibt sich für den mittleren Fehlerabstand?
{Which value results for the mean error distance?
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
${\rm E}\big[a\big] \ = \ ${ 10 3% }
${\rm E}\big[a\big] \ = \ ${ 10 3% }


{Berechnen Sie den Wert der Fehlerkorrelationsfunktion (FKF) für&nbsp; $k = 1$.
{Calculate the value of the error correlation function (ECF) for&nbsp; $k = 1$.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$\varphi_e(k = 1) \ = \ ${ 0.0309 3% }  
$\varphi_e(k = 1) \ = \ ${ 0.0309 3% }  


{Welche Näherung gilt für die Wahrscheinlichkeit des Fehlerabstands&nbsp; $a = 2$?
{What is the approximation for the probability of the error distance&nbsp; $a = 2$?
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
${\rm Pr}(a = 2) \ = \ ${ 0.1715 3% }  
${\rm Pr}(a = 2) \ = \ ${ 0.1715 3% }  
</quiz>
</quiz>


===Musterlösung===
===Solution===
{{ML-Kopf}}
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Die mittlere Fehlerwahrscheinlichkeit ist gleich dem FKF&ndash;Wert für $k = 0$. Wegen $e_{\nu} &#8712; \{0, 1\}$ gilt nämlich:
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The mean probability of error is equal to the ECF value for $k = 0$. Namely, because of $e_{\nu} &#8712; \{0, 1\}$:
:$$\varphi_{e}(k = 0) = {\rm E}[e_{\nu}^2 ]= {\rm E}[e_{\nu} ]=
:$$\varphi_{e}(k = 0) = {\rm E}[e_{\nu}^2 ]= {\rm E}[e_{\nu} ]=
p_{\rm M} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}p_{\rm M}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.1}
p_{\rm M} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}p_{\rm M}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.1}
Line 60: Line 60:




'''(2)'''&nbsp; Der mittlere Fehlerabstand ist gleich dem Kehrwert der mittleren Fehlerwahrscheinlichkeit. Das heißt:  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; The mean error distance is equal to the reciprocal of the mean error probability. That is:
:$${\rm E}\big[a\big] = 1/p_{\rm M} \ \underline {= 10}.$$
:$${\rm E}\big[a\big] = 1/p_{\rm M} \ \underline {= 10}.$$




'''(3)'''&nbsp; Nach der Definitionsgleichung und dem [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Statistische_Abh%C3%A4ngigkeit_und_Unabh%C3%A4ngigkeit#Bedingte_Wahrscheinlichkeit| Satz von Bayes]] erhält man folgendes Ergebnis:
'''(3)'''&nbsp; According to the definition equation and [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Statistical_Dependence_and_Independence#Conditional_Probability| "Bayes' theorem"]], the following result is obtained:
:$$\varphi_{e}(k = 1) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm
:$$\varphi_{e}(k = 1) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm
E}[e_{\nu} \cdot e_{\nu + 1}] = {\rm E}[(e_{\nu} = 1) \cdot
E}[e_{\nu} \cdot e_{\nu + 1}] = {\rm E}[(e_{\nu} = 1) \cdot
Line 72: Line 72:
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


*Die erste Wahrscheinlichkeit ist gleich ${\rm Pr}(a = 1)$ und die zweite Wahrscheinlichkeit ist gleich $p_{\rm M}$:
*The first probability is equal to ${\rm Pr}(a = 1)$ and the second probability is equal to $p_{\rm M}$:
:$$\varphi_{e}(k = 1) = 0.3091 \cdot 0.1\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.0309}
:$$\varphi_{e}(k = 1) = 0.3091 \cdot 0.1\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.0309}
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$




'''(4)'''&nbsp; Der FKF&ndash;Wert $\varphi_e(k = 2)$ kann (näherungsweise) folgendermaßen interpretiert werden:
'''(4)'''&nbsp; The ECF value $\varphi_e(k = 2)$ can be interpreted (approximately) as follows:
:$$\varphi_{e}(k = 2) ={\rm Pr}(e_{\nu + 2}=1
:$$\varphi_{e}(k = 2) ={\rm Pr}(e_{\nu + 2}=1
\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} e_{\nu} = 1) \cdot p_{\rm M} \hspace{0.3cm}
\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} e_{\nu} = 1) \cdot p_{\rm M} \hspace{0.3cm}
Line 84: Line 84:
= 2)}{p_{\rm M}} = \frac{0.0267}{0.1} = 0.267\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
= 2)}{p_{\rm M}} = \frac{0.0267}{0.1} = 0.267\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Diese Wahrscheinlichkeit setzt sich zusammen aus &nbsp;"Zum Zeitpunkt $\nu+1$ tritt ein Fehler auf"&nbsp; sowie &nbsp;"Zum Zeitpunkt $\nu+1$ gibt es keinen Fehler":
This probability is composed of &nbsp;"At time $\nu+1$ an error occurs"&nbsp; and &nbsp;"At time $\nu+1$ there is no error":
:$${\rm Pr}(e_{\nu + 2}=1 \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} e_{\nu} =
:$${\rm Pr}(e_{\nu + 2}=1 \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} e_{\nu} =
1) = {\rm Pr}( a =1) \cdot {\rm Pr}( a =1) + {\rm Pr}( a =2)\hspace{0.3cm}
1) = {\rm Pr}( a =1) \cdot {\rm Pr}( a =1) + {\rm Pr}( a =2)\hspace{0.3cm}
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Pr}( a =2)= 0.267 - 0.3091^2 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.1715}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Pr}( a =2)= 0.267 - 0.3091^2 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.1715}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Bei der Rechnung wurde davon ausgegangen, dass die einzelnen Fehlerabstände statistisch voneinander unabhängig sind.  
In the calculation, it was assumed that the individual error distances are statistically independent of each other.
*Diese Annahme gilt allerdings nur für eine besondere Klasse von Kanalmodellen, die man als "erneuernd" bezeichnet.  
*However, this assumption is valid only for a special class of channel models called "renewing".
*Das hier betrachtete Bündelfehlermodell erfüllt diese Bedingung nicht.  
*The bundle fault model considered here does not satisfy this condition.
*Die tatsächliche Wahrscheinlichkeit&nbsp; ${\rm Pr}(a = 2) = 0.1675$&nbsp; weicht deshalb vom hier berechneten Wert&nbsp; $(0.1715)$&nbsp; geringfügig ab.
*The actual probability&nbsp; ${\rm Pr}(a = 2) = 0.1675$&nbsp; therefore deviates slightly from the value calculated here&nbsp; $(0.1715)$.&nbsp;  


{{ML-Fuß}}
{{ML-Fuß}}


[[Category:Digital Signal Transmission: Exercises|^5.1 Digital Channel Models^]]
[[Category:Digital Signal Transmission: Exercises|^5.1 Digital Channel Models^]]

Revision as of 12:35, 26 August 2022

Probabilities of error distances and ECF

For the characterization of digital channel models one uses among other things

  • the error correlation function (ECF)
$$\varphi_{e}(k) = {\rm E}\big[e_{\nu} \cdot e_{\nu +

k}\big]\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} k \ge 0\hspace{0.05cm},$$

  • the error distance probabilities
$${\rm Pr}( a =k) \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} k \ge

1\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Here denote:

  • $〈e_{\rm \nu}〉$  is the error sequence with  $e_{\rm \nu} ∈ \{0, 1\}$.
  • $a$  indicates the error distance.


Two directly consecutive bit errors are thus characterized by the error distance  $a = 1$. 

The table shows exemplary values of the error distance probabilities  ${\rm Pr}(a = k)$  as well as the error correlation function  $\varphi_e(k)$.

  • Some data are missing in the table.
  • These values are to be calculated from the given values.




Note:


Questions

1 Which value results for the average error probability?

$p_{\rm M} \ = \ $

2 Which value results for the mean error distance?

${\rm E}\big[a\big] \ = \ $

3 Calculate the value of the error correlation function (ECF) for  $k = 1$.

$\varphi_e(k = 1) \ = \ $

4 What is the approximation for the probability of the error distance  $a = 2$?

${\rm Pr}(a = 2) \ = \ $


Solution

(1)  The mean probability of error is equal to the ECF value for $k = 0$. Namely, because of $e_{\nu} ∈ \{0, 1\}$:

$$\varphi_{e}(k = 0) = {\rm E}[e_{\nu}^2 ]= {\rm E}[e_{\nu} ]=

p_{\rm M} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}p_{\rm M}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.1} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  The mean error distance is equal to the reciprocal of the mean error probability. That is:

$${\rm E}\big[a\big] = 1/p_{\rm M} \ \underline {= 10}.$$


(3)  According to the definition equation and "Bayes' theorem", the following result is obtained:

$$\varphi_{e}(k = 1) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm

E}[e_{\nu} \cdot e_{\nu + 1}] = {\rm E}[(e_{\nu} = 1) \cdot (e_{\nu + 1}=1)]={\rm Pr}(e_{\nu + 1}=1 \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} e_{\nu} = 1) \cdot {\rm Pr}(e_{\nu} = 1)

\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The first probability is equal to ${\rm Pr}(a = 1)$ and the second probability is equal to $p_{\rm M}$:
$$\varphi_{e}(k = 1) = 0.3091 \cdot 0.1\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.0309}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  The ECF value $\varphi_e(k = 2)$ can be interpreted (approximately) as follows:

$$\varphi_{e}(k = 2) ={\rm Pr}(e_{\nu + 2}=1

\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} e_{\nu} = 1) \cdot p_{\rm M} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Pr}(e_{\nu + 2}=1 \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} e_{\nu} = 1) = \frac{\varphi_{e}(k = 2)}{p_{\rm M}} = \frac{0.0267}{0.1} = 0.267\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

This probability is composed of  "At time $\nu+1$ an error occurs"  and  "At time $\nu+1$ there is no error":

$${\rm Pr}(e_{\nu + 2}=1 \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} e_{\nu} =

1) = {\rm Pr}( a =1) \cdot {\rm Pr}( a =1) + {\rm Pr}( a =2)\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Pr}( a =2)= 0.267 - 0.3091^2 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.1715}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

In the calculation, it was assumed that the individual error distances are statistically independent of each other.

  • However, this assumption is valid only for a special class of channel models called "renewing".
  • The bundle fault model considered here does not satisfy this condition.
  • The actual probability  ${\rm Pr}(a = 2) = 0.1675$  therefore deviates slightly from the value calculated here  $(0.1715)$.